So [name]Lucas[/name] seems to be quite the hot name around the world.
I read somewhere that in [name]England[/name] it’s considered “downtown” guessing that means common? Or a class distinction? Also read a comment it was popular with teenage moms.
[name]How[/name] true is this?
Also would you still use this name if you like it but dislike its popularity?
Downmarket, you mean? That generally means it’s low-class, not considered very appealing. Usually very trendy and a lot of people doubt it would look good on a resume. Although I don’t know why someone would say that about [name]Lucas[/name]. While it’s not my personal style, it’s certainly not downmarket. It’s a common, fairly traditional, respectable name.
As for popularity, totally. I could care less about popularity. I have names much more popular than [name]Lucas[/name] on my list, both as FNs and MNs.
I think Lucas is a bit trendy, but I still think it’s a nice name. Actually, I prefer Luca, although that’s quite popular, too.
In regards to your last question, I’ve vetoed a few names because of their popularity. For example, Charlotte and Sophie. I think they’re sublime names, but there are others I love just as much that aren’t as popular, so I’m more likely to choose one of those.
Erm, depends on the area. Where I am, [name]Nevaeh[/name], [name]Jayden[/name], [name]Braelyn[/name], [name]Bentley[/name], [name]Mercedes[/name], etc. are all pretty downmarket. I’ve heard that [name]Bailey[/name] (on a boy–it’s more used on a boy in the UK), [name]Zoe[/name], [name]Chloe[/name], and anything double barrel with [name]Mae[/name] on the end ([name]Ellie[/name] [name]Mae[/name], [name]Lily[/name] [name]Mae[/name], [name]Bella[/name] [name]Mae[/name], etc.) are that way in the UK, but it even varies within the UK. I’ve been told everything from [name]Bailey[/name] is chavvy to [name]Bailey[/name] is amazing and totally usable from friends in the UK, so I really think it just depends on the area.
Nooooo I wouldn’t consider [name]Lucas[/name] ‘downmarket’ at all. The opposite, in fact. I think perhaps 10-15 odd years ago, [name]Lucas[/name] was on the rise as a kind of hip name used by the middle classes and up- the sort of people buying houses in Notting [name]Hill[/name] etc. It’s levelled out since then and I wouldn’t be surprised to see it on a child from any social background.
[name]Ashley[/name], I wouldn’t say [name]Zoe[/name] or [name]Chloe[/name] were very downmarket either! I get that it varies though. Actually, these are the top 10 names I came across in our popularity lists that are stereotypical chav names:
And the top ‘chav’ names when I was at school were [name]Chelsea[/name], [name]Chantelle[/name], [name]Mackenzie[/name], [name]Portia[/name], [name]Ashley[/name] & [name]Nicole[/name]. So that gives you my view of ‘downmarket’. Sorry if I’ve offended anyone- this just comes with my personal experience of chavvy people and their (now vast) brood of offspring. I went to school with an inordinately high proportion of them
I love [name]Lucas[/name]. If I ever have a boy, he will be named [name]Lucas[/name]. Despite the popularity, the international aspect is why I love it.
As for it being “downmarket” I don’t see it that way.
[name]Lucas[/name]/[name]Luca[/name] is the most popular name in our Australian Playgroup for [name]German[/name] language speakers as it works in both countries.
In Germany it’s [name]Lukas[/name], it hast been super popular for many years, it’s a classic name with a modern sound. Definitely not downmarket here, more like “a normal unexciting choice”. It has been in the Top 10 for about 20 years now.
Hmm. Obviously, I’m not a UK expert, lol. But I had a friend who said she had quite liked both [name]Zoe[/name] and [name]Chloe[/name], but that every time she mentioned [name]Zoe[/name] to people she knew, they said it was a chav name, and I think she said the same about [name]Chloe[/name]. That, and [name]Chloe[/name] Mafia. That’s pretty much enough to put me off the name for life, haha.