Is it ok?

[name]Hi[/name] Berries!

[name]Just[/name] a quick question - would you mind using [name]Mary[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name] for middle names? They came up in our discussions and although we will not be using them, I just wondered if this (and other combos) like this are laughable, or if you would still use them in the middle positions, if you liked them?

Kath xx

Two of the best possible middle names ever, if you ask me. :slight_smile: Strong, classic, and usable as first name substitutes if your kids wind up, er, not loving their first names.

Yes for mn’s no for first names, as in, pick one.

Same goes for all things-

[name]Romeo[/name] & [name]Juliet[/name]
[name]Anthony[/name] & [name]Cleo[/name]
[name]Ross[/name] & [name]Rachel[/name]
[name]Bella[/name]/[name]Isabella[/name] & [name]Edward[/name]
[name]Heath[/name] & [name]Cathy[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] & [name]Darcy[/name] (But don’t they look great together?)

Ha ha, yes, it would only be mn’s, and in different positions (2 middle names each) - not first names! x

Go for it.

To give you an idea of what we WERE considering, it would have been:

[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name] [name]Noah[/name]
[name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Rachel[/name]
[name]Findlay[/name] [name]Joseph[/name] [name]Aaron[/name]
[name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name] [name]Mary[/name]

What do you think? [name]How[/name] bad/ noticeable is the [name]Mary[/name]/Jospeh thing in this context?!

Kath xx

I don’t find it as a problem at all. Very rarely will anybody hear the full names of all the children anyway, but I do think those combos are lovely!

Kath,

My grandmother’s parents were actually named [name]Mary[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name]! [name]Mary[/name] [name]Catherine[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name] [name]Benjamin[/name] or [name]Joseph[/name] [name]Bernard[/name] - we’re not totally sure what his middle name was, as his records say both…

I think when used in the context of [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Joseph[/name] [name]Aaron[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name] [name]Mary[/name], you are totally fine! They work very well with [name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name] [name]Noah[/name], too! As for [name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Rachel[/name], personally I think I’d use [name]Sarah[/name] ([name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Rachel[/name] [name]Sarah[/name]? [name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Rachel[/name] [name]Sara[/name]? [name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Sarah[/name] [name]Rachel[/name]?) instead of [name]Eva[/name], as it feels more classic and Biblical to me, but go with your gut and choose what you love!

[name]Lemon[/name] :slight_smile:

I don’t think the [name]Mary[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name] connection is that obvious in your examples. [name]Even[/name] if it were obvious, I don’t think it would be terrible, though I wouldn’t use both as first names (which I know you’re not doing). But I’d even use one as a first name and one as a middle and I think it would be fine.