[name]Just[/name] a quick question - would you mind using [name]Mary[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name] for middle names? They came up in our discussions and although we will not be using them, I just wondered if this (and other combos) like this are laughable, or if you would still use them in the middle positions, if you liked them?
Two of the best possible middle names ever, if you ask me. Strong, classic, and usable as first name substitutes if your kids wind up, er, not loving their first names.
My grandmother’s parents were actually named [name]Mary[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name]! [name]Mary[/name] [name]Catherine[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name] [name]Benjamin[/name] or [name]Joseph[/name] [name]Bernard[/name] - we’re not totally sure what his middle name was, as his records say both…
I think when used in the context of [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Joseph[/name] [name]Aaron[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name] [name]Mary[/name], you are totally fine! They work very well with [name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name] [name]Noah[/name], too! As for [name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Rachel[/name], personally I think I’d use [name]Sarah[/name] ([name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Rachel[/name] [name]Sarah[/name]? [name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Rachel[/name] [name]Sara[/name]? [name]Elspeth[/name] [name]Sarah[/name] [name]Rachel[/name]?) instead of [name]Eva[/name], as it feels more classic and Biblical to me, but go with your gut and choose what you love!
I don’t think the [name]Mary[/name] and [name]Joseph[/name] connection is that obvious in your examples. [name]Even[/name] if it were obvious, I don’t think it would be terrible, though I wouldn’t use both as first names (which I know you’re not doing). But I’d even use one as a first name and one as a middle and I think it would be fine.