Is it possible to have a James that isn't called Jim/Jimmy/Jimbo?

Or is it just a rule of the universe that people need to ruin the name with these gross nicknames? :wink:

It is possible! I know a [name]James[/name] that has only ever been called [name]James[/name] and he’s a teenager.

I really dont understand how people get those NNs from [name]James[/name] anyways. It doesnt even have an I in it.

Same with [name]William[/name]'s being called [name]Bill[/name] or [name]Billy[/name]. [name]DO[/name] NOT GET. XD

It’s very possible. I have three friends named [name]James[/name], at least two of whom were never called by a nickname (I’m not sure about the third).

I know a [name]James[/name] who’s a teenager and is called exclusively [name]James[/name] :stuck_out_tongue: Alternate nns are [name]Jem[/name] & [name]Jam[/name]

I know several men named [name]James[/name] who go by [name]James[/name]! I actually only know one [name]James[/name] that goes by a nn and that is only because he is a III The grandfather is [name]James[/name], the son [name]Jim[/name], and the youngest [name]Jamie[/name] so I don’t think you would have an issue if you did not want people to shorten his name. [name]James[/name] is so short anyway that it should really not be an issue.

It isn’t much of a difference, but I’ve always liked [name]Jamie[/name] as a nn for [name]James[/name]!

I had one [name]James[/name] in my class throughout grade school, and another in college. They were both called ā€œ[name]Jimbo[/name]ā€ā€“I think against their will–by peers. Granted, they did both go by [name]Jim[/name] variants ([name]Jimmy[/name], [name]Jim[/name]), so maybe the ā€œ[name]Jimbo[/name]ā€ thing only happens if you go by [name]Jim[/name]? All I can say is, I have very strong memories of annoying rowdy boys yelling ā€œ[name]JIMBO[/name]!ā€ But I think [name]James[/name] (just [name]James[/name], or nn [name]Jamie[/name]) is an awesome name.

I agree it’s totally possible! I don’t really know any Jameses, but I think it’s completely possible. I don’t know if they really appeal to you, but I’ve heard of [name]Jack[/name] and [name]Jamie[/name] as nns for [name]James[/name], as well…

Good luck!

My husband’s name is [name]James[/name] and goes by [name]James[/name] or [name]Jay[/name] only - always has.

Its possible as long as you insist his name is [name]James[/name] and nothing else. Personally I would never use a nn on someone I didnt know very very well and especially not on a child unless there parents told me they went by a certain nn. I think its rude to assume someones kid [name]Elizabeth[/name] goes by [name]Liz[/name] or [name]James[/name] goes by [name]Jimmy[/name].

It is certainly possible. I never understood the purpose of a nickname for a one syllable name anyhow.

If you insist that he is just called [name]James[/name], then definitely! Although he may want to go by [name]Jim[/name] etc in the future :stuck_out_tongue:
I know several boys named [name]James[/name], and they all just go by [name]James[/name], except one.

I know a mid-20s [name]James[/name] who has only ever gone by [name]James[/name]. I also know a teenage [name]James[/name] who goes exclusively by [name]Jamie[/name], which is somewhat better than [name]Jimbo[/name] [name]IMO[/name]! :slight_smile:

It is possible but you’ll need to reinforce this to others that he is only [name]James[/name]. However, as he gets older he may opt to become [name]Jim[/name]/[name]Jimmy[/name] if hears it from peers or whoever.

Although [name]Jem[/name], [name]Jay[/name] or [name]Jamie[/name] would be nice enough nicknames!

My brother is usually a [name]James[/name].

I call him all sorts though. The name related ones being [name]Jay[/name], [name]Jamie[/name], Jimbob (he’s a [name]James[/name] [name]Robert[/name], it works), and [name]Jam[/name]-Jar (long story).

But other than me and my sister he’s a [name]James[/name] all the time.

Our oldest son’s name is [name]James[/name]. When he was born, my husband’s brother immediately said ā€˜[name]Jimmy[/name]!!!’ when we announced his name. We were very clear from the beginning that we’d call him [name]James[/name] and now he’s 7 years old and the family wouldn’t think of calling him anything else. Can’t even imagine him as a [name]Jimmy[/name]. Though I will say that I recently visited his 1st grade class and though 99% of kids refer to him as [name]James[/name], I did overhear one boy say [name]Jamie[/name]… hoping this doesn’t catch on. But my son prefers [name]James[/name], that’s what he knows. We haven’t had any problems with it, but guessing some people think the name ā€˜[name]James[/name]’ just seems too grown up for a child? I think it’ll definitely help out with more and more kids going by formal names vs. nicknames… especially with names in which a few generations before would have thought such names were only for adults, i.e. [name]Henry[/name], [name]Peter[/name], [name]Thomas[/name], [name]Matthew[/name], etc…

Good luck!

[name]Every[/name] [name]James[/name] I’ve ever known, has gone by [name]Jack[/name]. I never understood why, but I always thought that was the default nickname!

yes, it’s possible. [name]Don[/name]'t ever call him anything but [name]James[/name].

Definitely possible. Our two boys, [name]Henry[/name] and [name]Peter[/name], have yet to be called anything other than their full-names. I’m still holding my breath wondering if that’ll change as we go thru their school years. Here’s hoping!