[name_f]Juno[/name_f] [name_f]Tigerlily[/name_f] [name_u]Cadence[/name_u] …
(with a short, 4 letter, 1 syllable last name?)
It’s long, but it’s nice.
It’s fine! She wouldn’t be known by all four names at all times. I’ve always liked having two middle names, and my surname is much longer.
I have to say though, I would prefer this combo without the [name_u]Cadence[/name_u] — not just in terms of length but style and flow too. [name_f]Juno[/name_f] [name_f]Tigerlily[/name_f] is stunning
I don’t think it’s too long! it’s a sweet name
I agree with [name_f]Katinka[/name_f]. Adding [name_u]Cadence[/name_u] detracts from the distinctiveness of [name_f]Tigerlily[/name_f]. [name_m]Just[/name_m] go with [name_f]Juno[/name_f] [name_f]Tigerlily[/name_f].
It’s not long at all! But I do agree about preferring this combo without [name_u]Cadence[/name_u], it gives more of a “wow” factor
not too long! lovely combo
I’m personally not a fan of double middles, but it’s a nice combo and wouldn’t be too long.
I think tht [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] is better
Another vote here for just [name_f]Juno[/name_f] [name_f]Tigerlily[/name_f]! Sounds absolutely ethereal and strong. What a beautiful pairing.
It doesn’t feel overly long! [name_f]Juno[/name_f] [name_f]Tigerlily[/name_f] also works fine on its own