One ends with -as and the other starts with it, so I am curious whether you think they’re too close to use together.
for me, nope! i say silas as si-lis rather than si-las
but even if you pronounce it as the second option, you could always say ‘aspen & silas’ over ‘silas & aspen’ if it bother you too much!
2 Likes
Not at all too similar!
2 Likes
I think it’s fine 
plus you can always say it as [name_u]Aspen[/name_u] and [name_m]Silas[/name_m] if it bothers you a bit
2 Likes
Not at all! They go well together
2 Likes
No, not too close.
1 Like
No I didn’t even realize that they both contained as. I like them as siblings
1 Like
I don’t think they are close at all !!
1 Like
I actually really like how they have some repeating sounds. They sound really nice together.
1 Like
No definitely not too similar I think they work rather well together
1 Like
I agree it’s not too close, just kind of a cute subtle link.
1 Like
[name_f]My[/name_f] first reaction to the title of this was…How are they similar - the tree/wood/forest theme?
It would never have occurred to me that they are similar names at all.
I pronounce [name_m]Silas[/name_m] as Sigh-luss and [name_u]Aspen[/name_u] as Ass-pun so the only shared sound is s
I don’t think so!
1 Like