I love the name Dulcibella. I’ve been seeing it get some love, which made me wonder why we only see “certain” variants of [name_f]Dulcie[/name_f] used. [name_f]Dulcet[/name_f],[name_f]Dulcie[/name_f], [name_f]Dulcinea[/name_f], [name_f]Dulciana[/name_f], [name_f]Dulcina[/name_f], Dulcibeau, Dulcibel and Dulcibell are all being considered and used, but could the older versions of [name_f]Dulcie[/name_f] be revived.
I know that many of them are obsolete but should they stay that way? Would reviving older spellings work with today’s new Kre8tiv spellings, and old revivals like [name_f]Amabel[/name_f], [name_f]Alberta[/name_f], [name_f]Doveva[/name_f], [name_f]Fenella[/name_f], [name_f]Mabel[/name_f], Mrytle, [name_f]Winifred[/name_f], and so on…?
I think it creates more avenues of name options and even gender options, perhaps nn options. What do you think?
Some different spellings include:
Duz, -I’m uncertain about this one
[name_f]Duce[/name_f], - too similar to card names?
[name_f]Dusa[/name_f] - this would work well with nn for [name_f]Drusilla[/name_f]-?
Dowse,
Dous
[name_f]Douce[/name_f],
Dowse,
[name_f]Duce[/name_f] - sounds masculine to me-?
[name_m]Dowson[/name_m] - sounds masculine to me-?
[name_f]Dulcia[/name_f]
Doulce,
Doulse,
[name_f]Dulcey[/name_f],
[name_f]Dulcy[/name_f],
[name_f]Dulce[/name_f],
Dulse, - to similar to pulse-?
Dowlce,
[name_f]Dulcea[/name_f].
Dowsabel - I like this one, it has a handy nNN. [name_f]Doe[/name_f]
or Dousabel – nn. sabel-?
For info check out this site: http://appellationmountain.net/dulcie-baby-name-day/#comment-96904