Is this an ok way to name #4?

Girl Names
1

Kind of at a standstill with names! I’ve posted before that my choice for baby #4 is [name_f]Marigold[/name_f]. My husband has really never had much interest in naming…until today ha!

We have three children:
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u],
[name_m]Declan[/name_m]
and [name_f]Penelope[/name_f]

Tonight, my husband had an idea to pull the fourth (and final) baby’s name from a combo the sister’s middle names.

[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Maria[/name_f]
[name_f]Penelope[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]

[name_u]Baby[/name_u] #4…[name_f]Rosemary[/name_f]

Is that weird or does it work? I am a-ok with either name!

2

I like it. It’s a simple way to connect her to her sisters. I’m sure they’d love it as well.

It’s not a bad name either!

3

I think it’s cool.
What about [name_f]Rosemarie[/name_f]?

4

If you like [name_f]Rosemary[/name_f], why not? I’m not usually a fan of smooshing names to create a sibling/child name, but in this case [name_f]Rosemary[/name_f] is a proper name which sounds lovely and works really well with your other children’s names. Because it’s taken from your other girls’ middles, it’s a subtle way of linking the three together, while giving each her own unique name.

5

I agree with above poster. However, I prefer [name_f]Marigold[/name_f].

6

It’s not something I would prefer to do.

7

I really prefer [name_f]Marigold[/name_f]… I would not personally use the sisters middles to come up with a name… I feel like new baby sold have her own special and unique name and I think [name_f]Marigold[/name_f] is perfect!!

8

I think it’s cute! :slight_smile: and I have a soft spot in my heart for the name [name_f]Rosemary[/name_f] nn [name_f]Rosie[/name_f].