Would it be weird to use [name_m]John[/name_m] as a mn for [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] since [name_m]Jack[/name_m] can be a nn for [name_m]John[/name_m]. I was just wondering if it would be weird. I would love to pick a boys names that works good with [name_m]John[/name_m] being the middle name and I think [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m] sounds okay together. Thoughts???
It’s basically the same name for me: [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] is “son of [name_m]Jack[/name_m]” and [name_m]Jack[/name_m] is a nn for [name_m]John[/name_m]. In the end, it’s [name_m]Johnson[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m]. It’s not ideal. From your signature names, [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] would be fine with [name_m]Theodore[/name_m], [name_m]Henry[/name_m] and [name_u]Elliot[/name_u] in the middle spot.
It’s super duper redundant. I really don’t like using names with the same roots together (like within sibsets. [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] & [name_f]Leonor[/name_f] don’t bother me, but something like [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] and [name_f]Isabel[/name_f] does).
[name_u]Elliott[/name_u] [name_m]John[/name_m] is so handsome! I would absolutely use that one 
I do find it kind of weird. They sound okay together just purely based on how they sound, it has a good flow. But the [name_m]Jack[/name_m]/[name_m]John[/name_m] thing bothers me.