What do you think of the combo [name_f]Joanna[/name_f] [name_f]Cecily[/name_f] [name_f]Maeve[/name_f]? Does the flow work? What would you rate it?
[name_f]Do[/name_f] you have any other suggestions to fill in the blank: [name_f]Joanna[/name_f] ____ [name_f]Maeve[/name_f]?
I like the rhythmic flow. As for the name combos, I’m not certain that [name_f]Cecily[/name_f] is the best fit stylistically. I tend to think of [name_f]Joanna[/name_f] and [name_f]Cecily[/name_f] in very separate name groups. But that could be me!
suggestions:
[name_f]Eleanora[/name_f]
[name_f]Mariella[/name_f]
[name_f]Suellen[/name_f]
[name_f]Sandrine[/name_f]
[name_u]Whitney[/name_u]
I think it’s absolutely lovely.
I think the flow works really well. I would personally prefer to see [name_f]Johanna[/name_f] in place of [name_f]Joanna[/name_f] (it seems fresher to me).
It works…contrary to my style, but there are always nicknames. (I was watching ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner’ where [name_f]Joanna[/name_f] got abbreviated to [name_u]Joey[/name_u]…sweet!)
[name_u]Truly[/name_u] beautiful!
I think it’s very nice. I prefer [name_f]Cecily[/name_f] and [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] to [name_f]Joanna[/name_f], but the flow is great. Visually, [name_f]Cecily[/name_f] is perfect in the middle.
It’s beautiful! I’ve always love [name_f]Joanna[/name_f] and it sounds with the two middles. Great combo!