See the results of this poll: Jonathan vs Jack
Respondents: 26 (This poll is closed)
- Jonathan Ross Garvin : 17 (65%)
- Jack Ryan Garvin: 9 (35%)
I suppose [name]Jonathan[/name] could be called [name]Jack[/name], if [name]John[/name] can, why not [name]Jonathan[/name]. I myself prefer just [name]Jack[/name] though!
[name]Jonathan[/name] [name]Ross[/name] is infinitely more timeless and handsome than [name]Jack[/name] [name]Ryan[/name].
I like [name]Jack[/name] much more than [name]Jonathan[/name], but I like [name]Ross[/name] more than [name]Ryan[/name] as a mn. Would you consider [name]Jack[/name] [name]Roscoe[/name] [name]Garvin[/name]? I actually really love it! If not, [name]Jack[/name] [name]Ryan[/name] is still really awesome, and got my vote.
Good luck!
I prefer [name]Jonathon[/name] [name]Ross[/name] with your last name, it’s more timeless and handsome.
[name]Jack[/name] [name]Ryan[/name] is badass though, and I like [name]Jack[/name] a bit more than [name]Jonathon[/name]…okay a lot more.
But [name]Jonathon[/name] [name]Ross[/name] gets my vote.
“[name]Jonathan[/name] [name]Ross[/name]” is the [name]David[/name] Letterman of the UK 
[name]Jonathan[/name] can be Jonte, [name]Jonty[/name], Joffy, [name]Johnni[/name], [name]Jonny[/name], [name]Jon[/name], [name]Jo[/name], [name]Nathan[/name], [name]Nat[/name], etc.
Everyone calls their baby “[name]Jack[/name]” in the UK - think it’s still in the top 2… Great name; very popular.
Good luck!
I like [name]Jonathan[/name], it’s more timeless than [name]Jack[/name]. My husband’s name is [name]Jonathan[/name] and he get’s called [name]Jon[/name] generally. Sometimes he gets called [name]Jack[/name] because his initials are [name]JAC[/name].
[name]Jack[/name] [name]Ryan[/name] is a [name]Tom[/name] [name]Clancy[/name] character who has a half a dozen or so books. It’s a bland sort of action-hero and that is what [name]Jack[/name] [name]Ryan[/name] makes me think of.
I love the name [name]Jonathan[/name] and [name]Ross[/name] is okay. I do like a one syllable middle and a longer first. It got my vote easily.
[name]Jonathan[/name] is a lot less popular. [name]Every[/name] third baby boy where I live is called [name]Jack[/name].
If you’re dead set on the nickname [name]Jack[/name], I would call him [name]John[/name], not [name]Jonathan[/name], as that’s more traditional. [name]John[/name] is relatively uncommon as a boy’s name at the moment, compared to [name]Jack[/name].
I do like [name]Jonathan[/name] more than [name]John[/name], as a name, but I wouldn’t call a [name]Jonathan[/name] [name]Jack[/name].
I was thinking the exact same thing as Jollins I voted for [name]Jonathan[/name] as it has more gravitas and style in my humble opinion. [name]Jack[/name] is cool though.
[name]Jonathan[/name] [name]Garvin[/name] is a bit too rhymey for me so I voted for the spunky [name]Jack[/name] [name]Ryan[/name].
I voted [name]Jonathan[/name] because:
It’s more timeless and handsome.
If you ask me, [name]Jack[/name] is fine as a nickname.
You always have the cute [name]Johnny[/name]/[name]Jonny[/name] as a nickname option.
Yes I was also going to mention [name]Jonathan[/name] [name]Ross[/name]. Jonathan Ross - Wikipedia
[name]Jonathan[/name] [name]Ross[/name] for sure. [name]Jack[/name] [name]Ryan[/name] is too associated with spy novels ( Jack Ryan (character) - Wikipedia ) and sex scandels ( Jack Ryan (politician) - Wikipedia ).
[name]Jack[/name] is fine as a nn for [name]Jonathan[/name].