[name_u]Marlowe[/name_u] [name_f]Annabel[/name_f] - I love [name_u]Marlowe[/name_u]! She’s so sweet yet spunky. I’ve never been a fan of [name_f]Annabel[/name_f] though and she feels a little out of place in this combo. Maybe [name_u]Marlowe[/name_u] [name_f]Isabel[/name_f] or [name_u]Marlowe[/name_u] [name_f]Annalise[/name_f]?
[name_u]Marley[/name_u] [name_f]Grace[/name_f] - Adorable, sweet, yet simple. [name_u]Marley[/name_u], like [name_u]Marlowe[/name_u] is both pretty and feisty at the same time. [name_f]Grace[/name_f] is a bit of a filler name, but can’t deny that it sounds wonderful.
[name_f]Fern[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] - This is an interesting combo. I’m loving [name_f]Fern[/name_f] at the moment and flow-wise they definitely go together, but I’m not sure they match stylistically. I find [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] a little boring, albeit pretty.
[name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] - This is nice. [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] is one of my favourites at the moment, and you can’t go wrong with [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] (though I prefer the [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] spelling.) I feel this combo perhaps needs a second middle to make it a little more wow.
[name_f]Iris[/name_f] [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] - Gorgeous! [name_f]Iris[/name_f] is one of my latest crushes! I like [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] too, and [name_f]Iris[/name_f] [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is really precious.
[name_u]Blaire[/name_u] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] - I’ve never liked [name_u]Blaire[/name_u], to me it makes me think of the noise someone makes when something is gross (blegh!) [name_u]Blaire[/name_u] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is a nice, simple and sweet combo though.
[name_u]Everly[/name_u] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - I adore [name_u]Everly[/name_u] but [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is very plain. As a middle I often find it works, but here it feels disappointing. [name_u]Everly[/name_u] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] is my favourite [name_u]Everly[/name_u] combo.
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Sophia[/name_f] - I’d prefer [name_f]Sophia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f]. [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] feels very outdated to me although it seems very popular on Nameberrry. I just couldn’t imagine a little [name_f]Margaret[/name_f]. It seems a shame to hide [name_f]Sophia[/name_f] in the middle spot.
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Josephine[/name_f] - [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is beautiful, but [name_f]Josephine[/name_f] is another I’ve never seen the appeal of. I don’t like [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] for a boy, and that’s all I see here. It does work with [name_f]Olive[/name_f], but it wouldn’t be my choice.
[name_f]Daisy[/name_f] [name_f]Elaine[/name_f] - Another interesting combo! I like [name_f]Daisy[/name_f], although I do question how well she ages. [name_f]Elaine[/name_f] feels boring and outdated, but I admit I actually really like it with [name_f]Daisy[/name_f]. I think something about the repeated ‘ai’ makes it really sweet!
[name_u]River[/name_u] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] - This is my favourite! Both names are so whimsical. I like [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_u]River[/name_u] too.
[name_u]Sage[/name_u] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] - I’d rather [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] [name_u]Sage[/name_u]. I feel like [name_u]Sage[/name_u] isn’t enough name to be in the first spot.
[name_f]Willow[/name_f] [name_f]Jade[/name_f] - I like [name_f]Willow[/name_f] a lot! [name_f]Jade[/name_f] works really well with it, but it’s another “boring” name to me.
[name_f]Lilly[/name_f] [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] - This is really pretty! Both names are very popular so together they make one ultra-popular name. But that’s not a bad thing. They are popular for a reason! [name_f]Lilly[/name_f] [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] is lovely.
[name_f]Summer[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] - A bit of something-and-nothing to me. I like [name_f]Summer[/name_f], [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is a filler that sounds nice with every name. It’s okay, but it’s not wow.