Is [name_m]Leo[/name_m] too unsubstantial to stand on it’s own? Or too juvenile?
I think it stands fine on its own. It’s been used as an independent name for a very long time. In history, it was the name of several saints, popes and emperors.
I absolutely think [name_m]Leo[/name_m] stands on it’s own. It might be short, but I still think it’s a very strong name and it has a ton of historical usage.
[name_m]Leo[/name_m] definitely stands on its own. It is cute and fun for a child but ages well for a young man and adult. It’s fun and flirty without being really childish or immature.
It’s one of my favorites. I think it is a very strong name.
I think it can stand on it’s own, no problem.