I’m 99.9% certain I would name my first son [name_m]George[/name_m]. However, recently I’ve really fallen for [name_u]Easton[/name_u]. I am likely to only be able to afford one child so was thinking [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_u]Easton[/name_u]…
… but what if I had another son? I think I might want to use [name_u]Easton[/name_u] (but I also really like [name_u]Max[/name_u].)
So do I:
Go with [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_u]Easton[/name_u]?
Or choose another middle name with [name_m]George[/name_m] just in case?
I would use [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_u]Easton[/name_u] this time. If and when you do have another child, it may not be a boy and even if it is you may have decided that another name has risen to the top.
Go with [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_u]Easton[/name_u], especially if you aren’t sure if you’ll even have another child - and that child might be a girl anyways! [name_m]Even[/name_m] if you have another boy, you could go with [name_u]Max[/name_u], that’s stylistically better with [name_m]George[/name_m] anyways! [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_u]Easton[/name_u] is very handsome.
[name_m]George[/name_m] [name_u]Easton[/name_u] is very handsome! But, [name_m]George[/name_m] and [name_u]Easton[/name_u] do not sound like brothers. I would definitely use both for your son and if you choose to extend your family in the future you can fall in love with new names.
I think [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_u]Easton[/name_u] is your best bet. Time changes tastes, so by the time you have a second child, you may well have a few other favourites…and there’s always [name_u]Max[/name_u] (which I think does go better with [name_m]George[/name_m], than [name_u]Easton[/name_u] would for brothers).
I agree, [name_m]George[/name_m] & [name_u]Easton[/name_u] don’t sound like brothers, but [name_m]George[/name_m] & [name_u]Max[/name_u] do, & [name_u]Easton[/name_u] & [name_u]Max[/name_u] do. I’d go with [name_u]Easton[/name_u] [name_m]George[/name_m], because [name_m]George[/name_m] is so very popular right now.