Normally we don’t talk about politics on here, but in Kentucky there is a bill targeting gender transitioning of minors that has a provision that may be relevant to the name-nerd community. One of the provisions is banning a court from granting a legal name change to a minor if the court determines the name change is to help facilitate a gender transition (and another from allowing a birth certificate to be amended to reflect such a name change, when there are other kinds of name changes they would amend the record for).
Notwithstanding anyone’s opinion on the ethics of medically transitioning a minor (and that shouldn’t be discussed here in keeping with the general “no politics” rule), the provision I pointed out could enshrine a legal definition of what a “male” and “female” name is in that state (with ramifications potentially felt by any parent wanting to change or even name their baby, or a cisgender person wishing to rename themselves, beyond the transgender community). I don’t live in Kentucky, but if someone sees this and wishes to point out this absurd IMO (and likely unconstitutional as it goes against precedents not specific to the transgender community on the right to a name change) provision in this bill here’s the contact page for the Kentucky legislators.