Is [name_u]Kit[/name_u] substantial as a standalone name?
What longer names would you pair it with? Thinking along the lines of [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Lysander[/name_m] or [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Sullivan[/name_u], or even [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]
I don’t like [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] or variants, [name_u]Beckett[/name_u] might be a possibility as a longer name, but no idea what to pair that with? Any other ideas?
Absolutely, 100% usable on its own! I love [name_u]Kit[/name_u]! [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Lysander[/name_m] is really nice 
Kit [name_m]Theodore[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]November[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Rooney[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]
@katinka has a son named Kit. @katinka, any ideas?
I think [name_u]Kit[/name_u] is fine as a first name. I agree that a longer mn would be smart. All three of your pairs work well.
Otherwise, what about:
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Fenwick
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]William[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Matsu[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Mycroft
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Nadish
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Nahele
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Oscar[/name_m] / [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Oskar[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Phileas[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Phineas[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Pietro[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Seabert
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Seabrook
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Seafarer
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Sebastian[/name_m] / [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Bastian[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Sequoia[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Sherlock[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Siddhartha[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Somerled
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] Taranga
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Thoreau[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Wesley[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Wilder[/name_u] / [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Wilde[/name_u]
Definitely! I love [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Lysander[/name_m].
Kit [name_u]Oliver[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Maximilian[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Aurelian[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Julian[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Percival[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Peregrine[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Raphael[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Nathaniel[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Alasdair[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Ambrose[/name_m]
Definitely substantial on it’s own!! I have also seen [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] “[name_u]Kit[/name_u]” but I prefer just [name_u]Kit[/name_u]. [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Lysander[/name_m] is stunning!
Oh I love that one!
Kit is great! [name_f]My[/name_f] son is “just” [name_u]Kit[/name_u], I think it stands alone perfectly well, especially with a longer surname and/or middle name. I love your ideas, especially [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Lysander[/name_m] and [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Sullivan[/name_u].
I don’t really feel it’s substantial as a standalone sorry 
I do like the idea of [name_u]Beckett[/name_u] though
I love [name_u]Kit[/name_u]! Sweet but substantial!
Kit [name_m]Lysander[/name_m] is dreamy -I love it
Kit [name_m]Leonidas[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Ambrose[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Lionel[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Percival[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Perseus[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Balthasar[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Aurelius[/name_m]
Patrick, [name_m]Atticus[/name_m], [name_u]Killian[/name_u] or [name_m]Kurtis[/name_m] could be full names but I prefer just [name_u]Kit[/name_u]!
100% usable as a standalone and I think I even prefer it that way
ooh I like [name_u]Kit[/name_u]! I have also seen [name_m]Benedict[/name_m] as a long form, but it is very nice as a standalone, too.
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Percival[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Sylvester[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Ambrose[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Calloway[/name_u]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Julius[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Isidore[/name_m]
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Cedar[/name_u]
I love [name_u]Kit[/name_u] so much! It’s short and simple but feels full of personality. [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Sullivan[/name_u] is wonderful, and I also really like [name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_m]Lysander[/name_m]. I definitely prefer a long middle!
I hadn’t even thought of [name_m]Benedict[/name_m], I quite like that too 
Kit might be my favorite name. I think it stands on its own as well as any other nickname name. I personally prefer having a full name so it’s in my list as a short form of [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] (or [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] if I’m destined to be a girl mom), but I think it’s perfect in its own too.
Yeah I think so! I’m a big fan of nickname full names.
[name_u]Kit[/name_u] [name_u]Sullivan[/name_u] is so handsome