Respondents: 106 (This poll is closed)
I would say definitely [name]Scarlett[/name] or [name]Willow[/name]. I think [name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Scott[/name] sounds fine - as long as you don’t mind alliteration, I like it. It’s cute and memorable! And [name]Willow[/name] is a beautiful girl’s name. [name]Harper[/name] is kind of unisex, so it’s not my style, but if you love it…I just don’t think it has the same “ring” to it as [name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Scott[/name] or [name]Willow[/name] [name]Scott[/name]. [name]Emma[/name] is a little bit predictable, especially when paired with [name]Christina[/name]. I’m not really a fan of the name [name]Aria[/name] because it can be mispronounced or pronounced differently by different people. And [name]Juliet[/name] seems a little dramatic with your last name. I think you need something kind of modern but not too trendy, like [name]Scarlett[/name] or [name]Willow[/name]. I would go with one of those. In the end, though, they are all pretty names, so whatever you decide will be great. Congratulations!
[name]Willow[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] is fantastic. [name]Willow[/name] is so versatile and can work on a girly girl or a [name]Tom[/name] boy and paired with [name]Christina[/name] it has such a melodic sound. [name]Lovely[/name] name!
1 [name]Emma[/name]
2 [name]Willow[/name]
3 [name]Juliet[/name]
I voted for [name]Emma[/name]. I actually really like the flow of [name]Emma[/name] [name]Christina[/name]. [name]Aria[/name] would have been my second choice. 3rd, would be [name]Juliet[/name]. Good luck!
I voted for [name]Willow[/name], but I think [name]Emma[/name] would be great too.
I voted for [name]Emma[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name], because [name]Emma[/name] is a favourite of mine. 
I also think [name]Willow[/name] or [name]Juliet[/name] would be nice!
I also like [name]Emma[/name], but also voted for [name]Aria[/name], a name I don’t usually like. Best of luck!
Sadly, I do think [name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Scott[/name] may be a bit much
I voted for [name]Emma[/name], but I also like [name]Willow[/name] as a close second. I think [name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Scott[/name] maybe a little too much in both the start and end sounds being alike, though [name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Christina[/name] is lovely. As your surname can also be used as a first name, I’d avoid [name]Harper[/name], another surname name, and [name]Aria[/name] is prone to being constantly mispronounced as there’s several ways for it. [name]Juliet[/name] I’m just not a fan of in general and like [name]Scarlett[/name] feels like too much with your surname. [name]Julia[/name] would work, but the -t on the end doesn’t.
I voted for [name]Emma[/name] based on flow. I also love the name [name]Emma[/name]. It’s a bit popular I know but it’s classic so it should never become dated. [name]Willow[/name] and [name]Harper[/name] are also nice and have good flow but on their own they don’t match up to [name]Emma[/name] (in my opinion). I love the name [name]Scarlett[/name] and if it’s your number 1 name I say for it. The alliteration might put me off a little if it were my own child, but on the other hand it might be cute! Have you ever considered [name]Charlotte[/name]? Again, popular I know… but it’s similar to [name]Scarlett[/name] in sound and style, without the double"Sc" issue! [name]Charlotte[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name]… just a thought
I like the flow of [name]Emma[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name].
Scarlott or [name]Juliet[/name] are my fave!
I voted for [name]Aria[/name]! [name]Both[/name] my first and middle name end in an “ah” sound and I love it. It flows nicely and imo it sounds elegant. I love [name]Aria[/name] to begin with, but paired up with [name]Christina[/name], I like it even more. [name]Aria[/name] [name]Christina[/name] sounds memorable and lovely. I wouldn’t worry about the pronunciation issues with [name]Aria[/name], I think people over estimate how problematic it can be.
I voted for [name]Willow[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] and would have vote for [name]Aria[/name] second. I think with such a first-namey last name and a beautiful and classic middle like [name]Christina[/name] you can afford to go a little out of the box and whimsical. I think [name]Willow[/name] [name]Scott[/name] would be beautiful. (I prefer [name]Willow[/name] over [name]Aria[/name] because [name]Scott[/name] is short and [name]Aria[/name] [name]Scott[/name] in just a very short name without the [name]Christina[/name]. For me it feels like a few letters are missing to round out the flow of the name).
[name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Scott[/name] is a bit much, and I wouldn’t pair a surname given name like [name]Harper[/name] with a surname like [name]Scott[/name], which can also be used as a first name. [name]Emma[/name] and [name]Aria[/name] are both nice names, but I’m not a fan of either paired with [name]Christina[/name] due to both names ending with “a”. So my favorites for you are [name]Willow[/name] and [name]Juliet[/name], giving a slight edge to [name]Willow[/name] since [name]Juliet[/name] [name]Scott[/name] is a bit heavy on the “t” sounds at the end of each name.
You have some nice choices in your list. Here are some thoughts:
[name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] -too matchy imo
[name]Harper[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] - Hearper is the family name of the current Canadian prime-minister, so it’s really not a little girl’s name for me
[name]Emma[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] -pretty, but I would prefer if the first name didn’t have the same ending as the middle name
[name]Aria[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] -[name]Even[/name] prettier than [name]Emma[/name], but, again, I prefer when the first name doesn’t have the same ending as the mn
[name]Willow[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] -cute & pretty & has the best flow of all your options
[name]Juliet[/name] [name]Christina[/name] [name]Scott[/name] -you’ve saved the best for last! [name]Juliet[/name] [name]Christina[/name] is cute, pretty, stylish, classic, & it suits both a little girl & an adult professional.
[name]Emma[/name] [name]Christina[/name] sounds the best to me.
Personally, I love alliteration in names. I have a few children with alliterative names in my class right now (think: [name]Grant[/name] [name]Gerhardt[/name], [name]Conor[/name] Clarkson, etc). [name]Scarlett[/name] [name]Scott[/name] sounds great to me! You can’t go wrong with [name]Emma[/name] [name]Scott[/name] or [name]Juliet[/name] [name]Scott[/name]. [name]Both[/name] of those are wonderful options, as well.
Best of luck!
I think [name]Scarlett[/name], [name]Emma[/name] and [name]Willow[/name] flow best with [name]Christina[/name]! All are beautiful names!