Maud or Maude?

[name_m]Just[/name_m] what the title says…

[name_f][/name_f]

I know this has been posted a few times before, but the most recent one was all the way back in 2016. I’m not planning on having a child any time soon (still basically a child myself), but Maud/Maude has been on my list for a while and not knowing which spelling I’d use is actually driving me crazy. Without the e at the end, if feels incomplete to me, but the reason I fell in love with this name was from learning about Good [name_f]Queen[/name_f] [name_f]Maud[/name_f], and I’d like for there to be a connection there. Any incite would be greatly appreciated :heart:

2 Likes

I prefer [name_f]Maud[/name_f] spelling. [name_f]Maude[/name_f] seems [name_f]French[/name_f] and seagrey, while [name_f]Maud[/name_f] seems dark red and elegant. I understand why it feels incomplete without the -e, but it’s already nickname for [name_f]Matilda[/name_f].

2 Likes

I like the look of [name_f]Maude[/name_f] more as well, but agree that [name_f]Maud[/name_f] has more nice associations (I think of [name_f]Maud[/name_f] and other Poems[name_f][/name_f] by Tennyson)! At the end of the day, I think liking the look of a name written down is a bit more relevant and important than direct associations, though, so I’d do [name_f]Maude[/name_f].

2 Likes

I prefer [name_f]Maude[/name_f], she looks a little more finished to me! I think the connections are still there even with the added “e”

2 Likes

I prefer [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- it looks more complete and smooth to me. I think you could still use [name_f]Maude[/name_f] as a nod to [name_f]Maud[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- the connection is still there :slight_smile:

3 Likes

I like the simplicity of [name_f]Maud[/name_f]? [name_f][/name_f] [name_f]Maude[/name_f] feels a little more froufrou than it needs to, for me, but I feel similarly about several names ending in -e, like [name_f]Vivienne[/name_f], [name_f]Juliette[/name_f], [name_f]Violette[/name_f], etc. [name_f][/name_f] I like the simple [name_f]Vivien[/name_f], [name_f]Juliet[/name_f], and [name_f]Violet[/name_f] more (only exceptions to this seem to be -belle names like [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f], [name_f]Mirabelle[/name_f], etc.). [name_f][/name_f] I’m not a huge fan of either (don’t actively dislike either of them, either, though!), but I do like [name_f]Maud[/name_f] a little more than [name_f]Maude[/name_f], personally.

[name_f][/name_f]

Good luck!

2 Likes

I think I like [name_f]Maude[/name_f] a little more, but both are lovely!!

1 Like

I love both so so much and find them equally beautiful, but being dyslexic and having [name_f]Maudie[/name_f] on my list as a nn, I always find I misread [name_f]Maude[/name_f] as [name_f]Maudie[/name_f] and have to backtrack to get it right. I also agree that [name_f]Maud[/name_f] has more/stronger positive associations, and I see where you’re coming from with it looking incomplete. Overall, I’d probably go with [name_f]Maud[/name_f].

1 Like

I like [name_f]Maud[/name_f]. The e at the end of [name_f]Maude[/name_f] ages it I feel

1 Like

I prefer [name_f]Maud[/name_f].

[name_f][/name_f]

It’s a stronger name and I feel like the spelling [name_f]Maud[/name_f] embraces that, while [name_f]Maude[/name_f] unnecessarily tries to be ‘prettier’.

1 Like

I would instinctively spell [name_f]Maude[/name_f], so that is the spelling I prefer. [name_f]Maud[/name_f] seems unfinished somehow.

1 Like

I prefer [name_f]Maude[/name_f], she seems a bit more romantic to me :slight_smile:

[name_f][/name_f]

slightly off topic:
[name_f][/name_f]do the names [name_f]Maud[/name_f] and [name_f]Maude[/name_f] have the same pronunciation in [name_f]English[/name_f] or not? Because in my native language, [name_f]Maud[/name_f] has a very different pronunciation than in [name_f]English[/name_f]

1 Like

I prefer [name_f]Maud[/name_f]

1 Like

I totally get that feeling—names like [name_f]Maud[/name_f] or [name_f]Maude[/name_f] can feel so[name_f][/name_f] close yet distinct, and the spelling can carry a subtle vibe or meaning.

[name_f][/name_f]

Here’s the scoop:

[name_f][/name_f]
    [name_f][/name_f]
  • [name_f][/name_f]

    [name_f]Maud[/name_f][name_f][/name_f] (without the “e”) is the classic, historical spelling. It’s what Good [name_f]Queen[/name_f] [name_f]Maud[/name_f] of Norway (also known as [name_f]Queen[/name_f] [name_f]Maud[/name_f] of England) actually used. So if you want a direct connection to the queen and that regal, vintage feel, [name_f]Maud[/name_f][name_f][/name_f] is the way to go.

    [name_f][/name_f]
  • [name_f][/name_f]
  • [name_f][/name_f]

    [name_f]Maude[/name_f][name_f][/name_f] (with the “e”) is more common in modern English-speaking countries, especially in the U.S. It tends to feel a bit softer or more feminine to some people, maybe because it resembles names like “Maude” in literature or pop culture. The extra “e” can make it feel a little more “complete” or modern, like you mentioned.

    [name_f][/name_f]
  • [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]

Since your heart is set on the queen and the historical link, I’d say go with [name_f]Maud[/name_f][name_f][/name_f]. It honors that legacy exactly and keeps the name’s rich heritage intact. But if you want a version that feels a bit more contemporary or lyrical, [name_f]Maude[/name_f][name_f][/name_f] is lovely too!

[name_f][/name_f]

[name_f]Do[/name_f] you feel more drawn to the royal history or the flow and look of the name? That might help tip the scales!

1 Like