With the all of the attention of “Mad Men” mid Century Modern homes and furniture, web sights devoted to everything from retro vintage recipes to rocakabilly clothes is it time we think about the wonderfully optimistic names that prevailed during the late 50s during the end of the [name]Kennedy[/name] Administration?
I am an older mom. Had my kids in my 30s and I am adopting more (3) from Ukraine.
In the first book “Beyond [name]Jennifer[/name] and [name]Jason[/name]” the boys names were decried as soft or “[name]Beach[/name] Boy Names”
Yet in the same book, under the list of names that were far out - the authors mentioned the nascent popularity of blonde wood furniture in Greenwich Village. Well now that’s in full swing. And not just in Greenwich Village.
I am not sure if his is my own nostalgia for a time that I remember as happy and prosperous, mixed with my own dislike of some of the more musty and dower Victorian names.
I have to say “[name]Eunice[/name]” and “[name]Adelaide[/name]” will never be name faves of mine and I was also not a huge fan of the Nouveau Consevatif trend - [name]Catherine[/name], [name]Harry[/name] et all.
I’ll admit it, I like [name]Kayden[/name]! Perhaps [name]Kayden[/name] has for me an MCM ring. Todays [name]Keith[/name] or [name]Kevin[/name].
I think that the moth ball manes have peaked and we should start naming kids names that kids like. Not names that show how scholarly we are. I strive for a happy medium there.
I really think late 50s early fifties parents, saddled with ungainly names themselves such as [name]Herbert[/name], [name]Gloria[/name], [name]Donald[/name], [name]Doris[/name], [name]Albert[/name], [name]Harold[/name], [name]Irma[/name] and [name]Norma[/name], wanted to give them names that were a bit more optimistic, playful and musty.
I have a [name]Chelsea[/name] and a [name]Connor[/name]. I loved the name [name]Chelsea[/name] all of my life - I met one girl in my life named [name]Chelsea[/name] - older than I , and I loved it’s British and [name]Arty[/name] - [name]Rock[/name] n [name]Roll[/name] association. I can see a lawyer named [name]Chelsea[/name]. As long as it’s spelled the right way.
[name]Connor[/name] was not trendy when I used it 18 years ago. I’ts also a family name.
Neither name was ever in the top ten to my knowledge. They have always been niche names.
But back to my question - is it tome we start thinking about mid century modern names and the theory of naming that prevailed then? I.E. naming kids names that they like. What names night be ripe for reintroduction?
Is a little trendy OK? [name]Do[/name] you know a lot of kids who want to be named [name]Imogene[/name] or [name]Elmer[/name]? 'Cause I do not.