Middle name for Cleopatra?

See the results of this poll: Whaddya think of Cleopatra

Respondents: 27 (This poll is closed)

  • Hate it!: 4 (15%)
  • Eh.: 4 (15%)
  • I like it but I wouldn’t use it.: 15 (56%)
  • I like it.: 1 (4%)
  • Love it!: 3 (11%)

[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Mary[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Jane[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Lily[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Sophie[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Violet[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Helen[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Lilian[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Isabel[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]May[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Maeve[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Ruby[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Frances[/name]
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Eloise[/name]

I wouldn’t exactly call some of these classic or short, but most of them are familiar.

I’d most definatley use it.
[name]Cleopatra[/name] Issis
[name]Cleopatra[/name] [name]Alexandria[/name].

I really like it. I don’t think it is that far removed from [name]Patricia[/name] and [name]Theodora[/name]. While [name]Patricia[/name] has been popular in its time, [name]Theodora[/name] and [name]Cleopatra[/name] are underappreciated.

I hope you go for it! Much nicer than Maddyson!

[name]Hi[/name]!

Are you looking for the [name]Cleo[/name] nickname? Personally, I think [name]Cleopatra[/name] is too defined by the person of the past to be accessible today. [name]Cleopatra[/name], in my opinion, is like Tutankhamen or [name]Hannibal[/name], you know - very defined by that particular historical person. Therefore, I would not use the name myself, nor would I comfortably recommend it to another person.

Granted, the flow of the name is very pretty, feminine, yet strong - I see why it appeals! Maybe [name]Cliantha[/name] “[name]Clio[/name]” might work?

[name]Lemon[/name] :slight_smile: