[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Autumn[/name_f]
OR
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
(Due in [name_f]September[/name_f])
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is my favourite - simple, but elegant!
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Autumn[/name_f] is amazing
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Autumn[/name_f] is lovely. Both lovely names and great together. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is nice as a first name but so expected in the middle that it loses its charm.
Both are lovely!
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is sweet, simple and traditional. But I do agree with a pp that [name_f]Rose[/name_f] has lost it’s charm as a mn, due to being used so much. I kind of expect it whenever I hear a birth announcement.
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Autumn[/name_f] is wonderful. She’s a bit more clunky than [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f], but I like that. I think I’m slightly more drawn to her in this case!
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Autumn[/name_f] is incredible.
I like [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] don’t get me wrong (there is also a lovely British folk/pop singer with that name, look her up!), but it’s a little one dimensional in comparison to [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Autumn[/name_f]. [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] and [name_f]Rose[/name_f] feel more like sisters - same number of letters, same classic girly feel. Whereas [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] and [name_f]Autumn[/name_f] are different enough to add something new to each other and for me that’s what makes a really striking combo.
I like [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Autumn[/name_f]