[name_f]Isabelle[/name_f] | [name_f]Arianne[/name_f] | [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] | [name_f]Violet[/name_f] | [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] | [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f] | [name_f]Lillian[/name_f] | [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] | [name_f]Eleni[/name_f] | [name_f]Anne[/name_f]-[name_f]Sophie[/name_f] | [name_f]Eva[/name_f] | [name_f]Tess[/name_f] | [name_u]Winter[/name_u] | [name_f]Hazel[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - [name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_f]Lena[/name_f]! [name_m]Just[/name_m] [name_f]Lena[/name_f], actually. Would you use [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] or [name_f]Eleni[/name_f]? Can’t use both. [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] is great with [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f], [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], [name_f]Violet[/name_f], [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f], [name_f]Lillian[/name_f], [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Hazel[/name_f]. I think it’s perfect in particular with [name_f]Violet[/name_f], [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], and [name_f]Hazel[/name_f]. I do find [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] a little bland, which is why I said I loved [name_f]Lena[/name_f] alone.
[name_f]Zoe[/name_f] - Fun and perky, but feels more modern, even if it isn’t. I think it works with [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f], [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] (depending on siblings), [name_f]Eleni[/name_f], [name_f]Eva[/name_f], [name_f]Tess[/name_f]. Really like [name_f]Zoe[/name_f] and [name_f]Eva[/name_f] together I think. Would make a nice pop in the middle.
[name_f]Zara[/name_f] - [name_u]Love[/name_u] how sophisticated and chic this one is. I think it sounds great with [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f], [name_f]Arianne[/name_f], [name_f]Violet[/name_f], [name_f]Anne[/name_f]-[name_f]Sophie[/name_f], [name_f]Eva[/name_f] in particular. It sort of blends with the more classic names, too. I’ve considered it as a middle myself.
[name_f]Lydia[/name_f] - I’ve long loved [name_f]Lydia[/name_f] and think it works with so many names on your list, particularly the most classic [name_f]Violet[/name_f], [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f], [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Tess[/name_f], and [name_f]Hazel[/name_f]. [name_f]Lyda[/name_f] is a neat nickname, as is perky [name_f]Lydie[/name_f].
[name_f]Penelope[/name_f] - What an up and comer in such a major way, she’s a takeover sort of name like [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]. I think she does a nice job merging styles in your short list. Can see her with [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f], [name_f]Arianne[/name_f], [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], [name_f]Violet[/name_f], [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f], [name_f]Lillian[/name_f], [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Eva[/name_f], [name_f]Tess[/name_f], and [name_f]Hazel[/name_f], maybe [name_f]Anne[/name_f]-[name_f]Sophie[/name_f]. Gosh, [name_u]Winter[/name_u] is sort of an oddball on your list in my opinion! It doesn’t work with [name_f]Eleni[/name_f] or [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] due to similar sounds, for me. I love [name_f]Poppy[/name_f] by the way and can see her with basically every name on your list, as a standalone.
[name_f]Rachel[/name_f] - Huh. Feels a little bland to me, honestly. I prefer [name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] of this particular Biblical set, or sister [name_f]Leah[/name_f]. I can in particular see [name_f]Rachel[/name_f] with [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] or [name_f]Tess[/name_f] on your list.
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f]/[name_f]Luella[/name_f] - [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] is prim, [name_f]Luella[/name_f] is cozy. They feel rather different but in a similar spectrum. [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] fits beautifully with [name_f]Violet[/name_f], [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f], [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], and [name_f]Hazel[/name_f]. [name_f]Luella[/name_f] is lovely with [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] in particular (I see her with names like [name_f]Clementine[/name_f] and [name_f]Margery[/name_f] and [name_f]Jemima[/name_f]).
I’d definitely add [name_f]Penelope[/name_f], maybe [name_f]Zara[/name_f], maybe [name_f]Lydia[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]. [name_f]Zoe[/name_f] as a middle name.