My favorites for girls

I’m tweaking my “short” list and looking for some feedback. Thoughts? Thank you in advance! :slight_smile:

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] (after my great grandma [name_f]Jewel[/name_f])
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] (or [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f])
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (or [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f])
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] (or [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f])
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] (or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f])
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] (or [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f])
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] (or [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f])
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f]
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] (or [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f])
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] (or [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f])

I personally adore [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] because I love [name_f]Anne[/name_f] of [name_u]Green[/name_u] Gables. Not sure I love it with [name_f]Eleanore[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] though.
Honestly, all your names are very pretty and timeless I feel. A truly lovely list.

You have a very intriguing name style.

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - I think these names compliment each other well. It’s a very nice combo.
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] - I love the feel of this combo, but I’m not sure I love the flow.
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] - I think this is a sweet combo. [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] helps [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] feel like less of an old lady name and more appropriate for a child.
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] (or [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]) - [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] is really interesting. I’m not sure I would say that I love it, but I would definitely be intrigued to meet someone with this name. [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] is nice, but a little boring.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (or [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f]) - [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] is great. It has a wonderful air and flow to it. I don’t like [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] at all.
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] (or [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]) - I don’t like the flow of either of these. If I had to pick one it would be [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f], but both of them just sound so plain.
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] (or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]) - [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] feels off to me. It doesn’t feel modern or vintage, just kind of dowdy. [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] is wonderful though! Perfectly balanced and so chic! [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] also has a beautiful classic elegance, but it’s not as special as [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f].
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] (or [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f]) - I like all of these names individually, and I like the idea of them together, I’m just not sure I like the flow.
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] (or [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]) - [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] is nice and pretty even if somewhat boring. [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] is much better.
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] - This name feels overly southern belle to me. I can’t imagine a girl with this name who didn’t have a strong [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] twang.
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - I love [name_u]Eloise[/name_u]! It’s such a fun, spunky name! [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] complements it well.
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] - I’ve always thought of [name_f]Harriet[/name_f] as a plain name and for some reason [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] makes it feel even more so.
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] (or [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]) - [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] is interesting. I’m not sure I like it, but I don’t hate it. It has a very different feel than all of your other names. It almost feels like [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] is trying to hard to make [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] cool again.
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] - Very pretty name, though [name_u]Winter[/name_u] makes [name_f]Estelle[/name_f] sound especially icy. Still I like it, it’s just not a warm name if that makes sense.
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] (or [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]) - I like the flow of [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u], but [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] just doesn’t feel like enough to freshen up [name_f]Maude[/name_f]. Maybe [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u]? [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] the flow feels off.

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - it seems like I’ve seen this combo a lot at least two different signatures it doesn’t seem original anymore just like when I was reading comments on the name [name_f]Constance[/name_f] on a different naming website and every other comment said they named their daughter [name_f]Constance[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] - beautiful I don’t know why people don’t like [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] the nn [name_f]Trixie[/name_f] is the only thing about this name I don’t like at all
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] (after my great grandma [name_f]Jewel[/name_f]) - gorgeous
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] (or [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]) - I prefer [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] to [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] even though [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] sounds better in the combo it’s so popular but I know a lot of Catherines so that might be my problem anyways it’s nms still cute
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (or [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f]) - I prefer [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] to [name_f]Iris[/name_f] but I don’t like [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] at all
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] (or [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]) - I love [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] and [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] but [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] is only OK a little plain imo
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] (or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]) - [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] sounds the best [name_f]Bess[/name_f] should not be revived even as a mn imo it’s a little too rhyme-y though [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] is nms I see the appeal
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] (or [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f]) - I prefer [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] [name_f]Alice[/name_f] or [name_f]Poppy[/name_f] [name_f]Alice[/name_f] but [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] sounds best because the balance of syllables
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] (or [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]) - [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] is a name I want to love as a fn but it sounds so harsh to me so I would only use it as a mn I would love to meet a [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] - these are not my style at all so I can’t really compliment this
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - cute
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] - [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] this! My only problem is a nn I’m thinking [name_u]Ari[/name_u] for me because [name_m]Harry[/name_m] is too masculine and hairy imo
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] (or [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]) - [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] is more exciting especially because [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] is starting to feel boring with all the [name_f]Maggie[/name_f]'s (a nn I cannot stand) [name_f]Margot[/name_f] would be a much better nn. [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] completely revives the name
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] - drop dead gorgeous
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] (or [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]) - I cannot stand the names [name_f]Maude[/name_f] or [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] I don’t know why they just make me cringe [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] sounds better though

I like your style! my favorites are

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] (after my great grandma [name_f]Jewel[/name_f]) - this is prob the farthest from my style, but I kind of love it!
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f]
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f]
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] - sounds a bit like my [name_u]Emmett[/name_u] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] :slight_smile:
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u]

(not much feedback, sorry, but these are the ones I think sound the best)

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]: I like it, but I’m not an [name_f]Edith[/name_f] fan
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]: I adore it!
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] (after my great grandma [name_f]Jewel[/name_f]): I like it a lot!
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] (or [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]): I love both, but [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] slightly more bc it is more unusual
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (or [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f]): I don’t like [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] that much
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] (or [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]): I like it
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] (or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]): I don’t like [name_f]Bess[/name_f], but the others are cute
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] (or [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f]): I love them both!
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] (or [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]): I like them
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f]: I don’t like either name
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]: I love it
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]: I like it
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] (or [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]): I prefer [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m], it is energetic and unexpected
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]: I like it
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] (or [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]): I like them

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - of course it’s a perfect name, for its style. The only problem is that [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] is just about as popular a middle as [name_f]Rose[/name_f] right now… I wonder if this name feels too serious because [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] has a heavy weight to it. My favourite middle with [name_f]Edith[/name_f] is [name_f]Ivy[/name_f], so I recommend [name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]!
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] - full of personality! I love it, though it feels a little less quietly dignified than the rest of the names on your list.
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] - rarely seen a more beautiful name. :slight_smile:
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] - perfect! Perhaps [name_f]Olive[/name_f] seems a little trendy, but [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] definitely does bring the name a lot of originality and sophistication.
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] - I don’t care for the repeated “iii” sounds (like in ‘ill’) in the names.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] - I love [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f]! It’s stunningly beautiful and just puts me in a good mood. Aristocratic, vintage, friendly, and a wonderful variety of sounds!
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] - close to [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] in a lot of ways, but that ‘G’ in the English pronunciation of [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] just doesn’t have as much light and colour as [name_f]Iris[/name_f] does with [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f].
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] - I like something more regal, e.g., [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f], or stylish, e.g., [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f], with the grand but gentle [name_f]Marianne[/name_f].
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] - same comment.
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] - this is so sweet and darling! An easy name to double barrel. [name_u]Love[/name_u] how unexpected [name_f]Bess[/name_f] is.
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] - looks regal, but [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] is too popular a name right now and I don’t care for the “sh” sound right after the ‘S’ in [name_f]Louisa[/name_f].
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] - great flow, I prefer [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] because it sounds more unexpected, a little sharper (in a good ways), stylish and not as safe.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] - [name_f]Alice[/name_f] is a very prim name, imo, so I think [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] lacks some of the “fun” needed to liven up the name.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f] - here it is! [name_f]Poppy[/name_f] loosens [name_f]Alice[/name_f] up, it’s lovely.
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - it’s pretty but I like something more dignified sounding, more crisp, with [name_f]Blythe[/name_f].
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] - this is a dignified name.
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] - perfect name! I love the variety of sounds and the flow is musicial.
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - truly lovely, even though both names are really popular.
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] - just beautiful!
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] - this looks like a full name. [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] seems too heavy with [name_f]Margaret[/name_f], drags it down.
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f] - with a ‘G’, ‘T’, and ‘D’ in quick succession sounds a bit guttural, but it’s a distinguished name.
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] - though pretty, it seems insubstantial, to me. But it also does have a nice “winter-y” mood to it, like a snowflake.
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] - seems old-fashioned but not in a trendy way, just a bit frumpy because of the weight of both names.
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] - this has the “vintage trendy” vibe you might be after!

My favourites:

  1. [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f]
  2. [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (a close second!)
  3. [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f]
  4. [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f]
  5. [name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]
  6. [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]
  7. [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f]
  8. [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]
  9. [name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] (with a strong suggestion to explore different middles)

Your favorite names are so classic and feminine! I like a lot of them. These are the ones I think sound best together, and the ones I’m tempted to use myself:

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - I like this a lot. [name_f]Do[/name_f] you have a short last name? I have a two-syllable fn and a one-syllable ln, and sometimes feel that my name sounds staccato.

[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] - [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] is favorite of mine, and I like the sound of [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f], but am not wholeheartedly behind [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] on its own merits.

[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] - I’ve really been feeling [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] lately! It seems so vintage, pretty and spunky at the same time. I like the nn options of [name_f]Aggie[/name_f] and Ness(ie), and it pairs so well with the beautiful, simple, heirloom name [name_f]Jewel[/name_f]. Nice choice.

[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] (or [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]) - assuming [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] is pronounced Dor-o-the-a, and not Dor-thee, I like it. Otherwise, I prefer [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] - [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is a sturdy girl in my mind, while [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] is very delicate, and I like the contrast. It’s a bit of a surprise and surprises are interesting.

[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] - both of these names rank high on my list, so this combination gets a thumbs-up from me!

[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] - I prefer [name_u]Marian[/name_u] or [name_u]Marion[/name_u] to [name_f]Marianne[/name_f], and think they flow into [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] a bit better than [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] does, since the emphasis is on the first, rather than the last syllable.

[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f], [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] - I love both of these! Out of curiosity, do you pronounce [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] like [name_f]Lu[/name_f]-ee-sah or [name_f]Lu[/name_f]-wee-zah? Either way, I’m digging these short B middles!

[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] - [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] is such a versatile name: it’s put-together and timeless on its own, and it has the fun nicknames [name_f]Maggie[/name_f], [name_f]Margot[/name_f], and [name_f]Greta[/name_f]. [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] is great name, although I sometimes wonder about surnames as middles - I more readily assume that the name has family significance than I would if it was used as the first. Not a big detractor, though.

Overall, I really like your name style, and would happily ask for your help pairing my favorites up, since I have so much trouble matching firsts with middles, and you seem to have a knack for it! Kudos!

I love [name_f]Louisa[/name_f], but I’m not too fond of [name_f]Bess[/name_f] or [name_f]Blythe[/name_f], I think [name_f]Beth[/name_f] or [name_f]Blanche[/name_f] would work better.

I love [name_f]Ivy[/name_f], [name_f]Iris[/name_f], [name_u]Winter[/name_u] and [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]!!

Any combinations of these names are perfect to me!

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]: No, not a fan
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]: [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] is ok, not really [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f]
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] (after my great grandma [name_f]Jewel[/name_f]): I do not like the name [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] at all.
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] (or [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]): I don’t like [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f], but I do like [name_f]Olive[/name_f] & [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]. They don’t flow together though.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (or [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f]): No & No
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] (or [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]): No & No
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] (or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]): I don’t like Loisa, but [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] is a pretty name! Also, [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] is nice for a middle name.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] (or [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f]): I like [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] :slight_smile:
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] (or [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]): [name_m]How[/name_m] about [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] ?
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f]: No, doesn’t flow
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]: No, not a fan of ‘[name_f]Pearl[/name_f]’ middle names
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]: [name_m]Don[/name_m]'t like [name_f]Harriet[/name_f], but like [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] (or [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]): I prefer [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m]
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]: Yes, I like it :slight_smile:
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] (or [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]): No, not a fan

[name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]: No, not a fan
[name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]: [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] is ok, not really [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f]
[name_f]Agnes[/name_f] [name_f]Jewel[/name_f] (after my great grandma [name_f]Jewel[/name_f]): I do not like the name [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] at all.
[name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f] (or [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]): I don’t like [name_f]Dorothea[/name_f], but I do like [name_f]Olive[/name_f] & [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]. They don’t flow together though.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (or [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Agnes[/name_f]): No & No
[name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] (or [name_f]Marianne[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]): No & No
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Bess[/name_f] (or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] or [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]): I don’t like Loisa, but [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] is a pretty name! Also, [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] is nice for a middle name.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] (or [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Poppy[/name_f]): I like [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_u]Juniper[/name_u] :slight_smile:
[name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] (or [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]): [name_m]How[/name_m] about [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] ?
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f]: No, doesn’t flow
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]: No, not a fan of ‘[name_f]Pearl[/name_f]’ middle names
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]: [name_m]Don[/name_m]'t like [name_f]Harriet[/name_f], but like [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]
[name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m] (or [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]): I prefer [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_m]Wilder[/name_m]
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]: Yes, I like it :slight_smile:
[name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] (or [name_f]Maude[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]): No, not a fan