My idiosyncratic rules for naming... what are yours?

I have a very short, chewy last name (lots of M’s and N’s) that ends in an “uh” sound. It’s led me to develop naming rules that I never saw coming!

Like…

  1. Most names containing M’s and N’s are full-stop OUT, especially those that begin or end with those letters.

  2. No name ending in an “uh” sound. I don’t want any sort of rhyming ending. …Though I admit I have one exception on my list - somehow it works.

  3. With my two-syllable last name, two-syll first names are okay but ONLY with one- or three-syll middles. If the first name is only two-syll, it makes rules one and two that much more important.

Some of my favorite-names-since-forever have been ruled out since meeting my husband. Oh well.

Are my rules weird? Or do you think similarly?
What are YOUR rules?

:wink:

My rules are similar to yours, only with different letters. We have 3 Ts in our name and it ends with an L sound. Plus the Ts in the middle sound more like Ds. So any name that ends in a D sound (like [name]Jude[/name]) or an L sound ([name]Abel[/name], [name]Mabel[/name], etc) would never work. And anything with multiple Ts, (like [name]Titus[/name]) would be terrible.

Because of our last name, I tend to avoid names that start with a ‘Wa’ sound. I like some alliteration, so I won’t elliminate all W names, but the ‘Wa’ sound would be cartoonish with our name.

I also avoid names that end with an ‘ak’ sound (like [name]Jack[/name]) because it would rhyme with our last name.

I had a speech impediment growing up, and still sometimes stumble on my words. For that reason, I tend to avoid names that have both an R and W in it (like [name]Rowen[/name]).

My last name rhymes with [name]March[/name], but starts with a B.

Since our name is only one syllable, I do not want to give a child a one syllable name. That just feels unfairly boring to me. (I grew up with 7 syllables :wink: ) So [name]Reed[/name] “Barch” and [name]Sloane[/name] “Barch” are out.

I’m absolutley in love with [name]Beckett[/name], but with “Barch” it sounds “cartoon-ish”. Therefore, B names are out.

I grew up with a nickname-less name. Because of this, I feel really weird using a name that doesn’t have a nickname. (I feel stronger about this for girl’s than I do boys.)

I really want a name to be gender specific. Our favorite boy name is [name]Rowan[/name], and I’m having a really hard time with the fact that its going to the girls.

Our last name starts with a D so I can’t use names that end in the D sound like [name]Wade[/name] or [name]Chad[/name] because the names run together. Our last name ends with “is” so I can’t use names that end in that sound either like [name]Fergus[/name] or [name]Nicholas[/name]. Other than that, I look for names with no nicknames, not too popular and no religious meaning or connotation.

I want to delete this post, but I don’t know what to do.

I want to delete this post, but I don’t know how to.

[quote=“susan”]Rules for my names

They have to go to bed on time:
PAJAMAla (rather than Pamela)
ZenROBE-bia (an alternate to Zenobia)

They’re not allowed to loiter on the sidewalk:
GOmez
HURRY-et (instead of Harriet)

They have to clean their plate:
EATrice (as opposed to Beatrice)
CHOW-ie (instead of Howie)
:smiley: I know, I am silly! Maybe I will think of some more well-mannered names.