[name]Isabella[/name] [1] - [name]Isabelle[/name] [105] - both names are fresh and pretty to my ears. I think part of [name]Isabella[/name]'s rise is the desire for [name]Bella[/name]'s because of Twilight. But that’s not all. I’m sure it’s partly just generally -a love. Also, I bet that if you totaled up all the Isabels and Isobels, [name]Isabelle[/name] would rise a little (I mean, [name]Isabella[/name] would also have Izzabela and whatever, but, it’s already in first spot!)
[name]Sophia[/name] [2] - [name]Sophie[/name] [59] - both are fresh and lovely to me. I think maybe to some [name]Sophia[/name] feels more complete, and [name]Sophie[/name] is more of a nickname? I don’t necessarily agree with that, but I can imagine others feel that way.
[name]Olivia[/name] [4]- [name]Olive[/name] [546] - to me, [name]Olive[/name] is held back by feeling “old” (not even dated, just “old” - which is part of why it’s having a mini-revival) AND [name]Olive[/name] Oyl. [name]Olivia[/name] both feels prettier, more feminine, and I think at least a small amount of its popularity must be due to the [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Benson[/name] character on [name]Law[/name] and Order, SVU, that show’s been on forever, is hugely popular, and she’s a very likeable main character.
[name]Alyssa[/name] [20] - [name]Alice[/name] [172] - this is one I can see tipping in the next few years. [name]Alyssa[/name] is lovely but is feeling very much like an 80s name, and [name]Alice[/name], while kind of “old”, is moving rapidly toward vintage charm, and [name]Tina[/name] [name]Fey[/name] named her baby this. They’re really quite different names. [name]How[/name] is the comparison for [name]Alicia[/name] and [name]Alice[/name]? To me those are also quite different.
[name]Julia[/name] [55] - [name]Julie[/name] [389] - to me, [name]Julia[/name] is a classic, whereas [name]Julie[/name] feels dated from the 1970s.
[name]Maria[/name] [86]- [name]Marie[/name] [575] - ditto, [name]Maria[/name] feels classic, [name]Marie[/name] feels like it was everyone’s middle name for the 1960s-1980s for a while.
[name]Adriana[/name] [129]- [name]Adrienne[/name] [696] - I think [name]Adrienne[/name] is the more attractive name here, but I think people pick [name]Adriana[/name] for additional distance and clarity over [name]Adrian[/name].
[name]Daniella[/name] [150]- [name]Danielle[/name] [195] - these are really quite close in ranking the grand scheme of things. [name]How[/name]'s [name]Daniela[/name]? I’m sure 20 years ago [name]Danielle[/name] was way ahead. [name]Danielle[/name] feels dated now like [name]Michelle[/name], [name]Daniella[/name] in comparison is fresher. I wonder if this is mildly influencing [name]Isabella[/name]/[name]Isabelle[/name]?
[name]Elena[/name] [163] - [name]Elaine[/name] [799] - I think at least a small part of this is Spanish-speaking families using [name]Elena[/name] a lot. I’m sure Anglo families do too, but I’d think they might be more likely to go with [name]Eliana[/name] or [name]Helena[/name]. [name]Elaine[/name] is definitely dated, again, if you go back in time, this would be totally reversed. To me, these names are pretty different. [name]How[/name]'s [name]Elaina[/name] doing?
[name]Diana[/name] [191]- [name]Diane[/name] - [name]Diane[/name] is definitely a name for a woman in her 40s or 50s to me, whereas [name]Diana[/name] feels relatively timeless.