After much ado, I’ve removed [name]Samuel[/name] from the list. I can’t call a tiny baby [name]Samuel[/name]…maybe [name]Sam[/name]. But I know [name]Samuel[/name] will be too long.
So my top choices are [name]Nathan[/name] and [name]Adam[/name]. I like [name]Adam[/name] a smidge better then [name]Nathan[/name], but there is a slight problem with it that you may notice on your own. My daughters names are [name]Amelia[/name] [name]Rose[/name] and [name]Eva[/name] [name]Brooke[/name]. Which name do you like best? Which do you like in the sibset?
Next thought…any cool middle name ideas?
Ohhhh, yeah I wouldn’t do [name]Adam[/name] and [name]Eva[/name]! I’m so sorry to say that since you like [name]Adam[/name] better! I’ll bet that most people wouldn’t put it together since you would probably say “[name]Amelia[/name], [name]Eva[/name] and [name]Adam[/name]” instead of “[name]Amelia[/name], [name]Adam[/name] and [name]Eva[/name]”… but still. It’s not the worst thing ever but it would really bother me, personally. I think it depends on how close in age they are, too, will they have the same group of friends? If they’re several years apart it could be ok, but not if they’re only a year or two apart.
I personally [name]LOVE[/name] [name]Nathan[/name] though, so I would go with that! [name]Amelia[/name], [name]Eva[/name] and [name]Nathan[/name] are just beautiful together if you ask me. The nickname [name]Nate[/name] is so cool too and it goes great with your girls.
[quote=“emily76”]After much ado, I’ve removed [name]Samuel[/name] from the list. I can’t call a tiny baby [name]Samuel[/name]…maybe [name]Sam[/name]. But I know [name]Samuel[/name] will be too long.
So my top choices are [name]Nathan[/name] and [name]Adam[/name]. I like [name]Adam[/name] a smidge better then [name]Nathan[/name], but there is a slight problem with it that you may notice on your own. My daughters names are [name]Amelia[/name] [name]Rose[/name] and [name]Eva[/name] [name]Brooke[/name]. Which name do you like best? Which do you like in the sibset?
If [name]Samuel[/name] is too long than [name]Nathan[/name] is too. [name]Adam[/name] is my pick and who cares about [name]Adam[/name] & [name]Eva[/name] its [name]Adam[/name] & [name]Eve[/name]. I don’t think it matters.
I like [name]Nathan[/name] and while it’s the same in theory as [name]Samuel[/name], “uel” makes it sound longer. [name]Nathan[/name] sounds cleaner. 
Agree with the whole [name]Eva[/name] and [name]Adam[/name] thing, probably best to avoid.
Congrats!!
Yeah, I would go with [name]Nathan[/name] because of the [name]Adam[/name] and [name]Eve[/name] connection. I’ve heard [name]Eva[/name] pronounced eh-va and ay-va instead of ee-va, though, so if that’s the case, maybe [name]Adam[/name] could work. However, I think that I’d personally make the connection, and it’s likely enough that others will. What about [name]Nathan[/name] [name]Adam[/name]? You could call him [name]Adam[/name] if you wanted, but introduce him as [name]Nathan[/name] or something… Well, something like [name]Nathaniel[/name] [name]Adam[/name] would flow better, but [name]Nathaniel[/name]'s even longer than [name]Samuel[/name]…
[name]Nathan[/name] for sure. I would avoid [name]Adam[/name] and [name]Eva[/name] at al costs.
[name]Nathan[/name] is a lovely name. [name]Adam[/name] is too match with [name]Eva[/name]…
I say [name]Samuel[/name] with 3 syllables (maybe 2.5). [name]Nathan[/name] is only 2. And [name]Eva[/name] is verry close to [name]Eve[/name].
[name]Nathan[/name], [name]Nathan[/name], [name]Nathan[/name]!!! AWESOME choice!!! It is adorable. mn possibilities.
[name]Nathan[/name] [name]Joseph[/name]
[name]Nathan[/name] [name]James[/name]
[name]Nathan[/name] [name]Samuel[/name]
[name]Nathan[/name] [name]Michael[/name]
[name]Nathan[/name] [name]Lee[/name]