What do you think of these?
[name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] (pronounced [name_u]Rain[/name_u])
[name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u]
[name_u]Hunter[/name_u] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f]
[name_u]Avery[/name_u] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
Thank you!
[name_m]Scott[/name_m]
From you first names I love [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] & [name_f]Juliet[/name_f].
[name_f]Sienna[/name_f] & [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] present the issue of 2 nature names, which may not bother you at all. I love [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] & [name_u]Skye[/name_u] is lovely too. So [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u] would be my pick of your combinations. I suggest [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] as a lovely combo to avoid 2 nature names or [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f].
[name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u] is my favorite by a long shot. [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] is also nice, but [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] is beautiful.
[name_u]Hunter[/name_u] and [name_u]Avery[/name_u] are all boy to me.
[name_f]Hannah[/name_f], [name_f]Esther[/name_f], [name_u]Winter[/name_u], [name_f]Ava[/name_f], [name_u]Raven[/name_u], [name_f]Mavis[/name_f], [name_u]Everly[/name_u] are all similar options you might like?
[name_u]Avery[/name_u] used on a girl is not unusual at all this day and age, but [name_u]Hunter[/name_u] is substantially more popular on boys and [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] is quite androgynous so together it’s really masculine.
My favorite is [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f]. I would love [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f].
Thank you so much, I like your assessment!
[name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u] is gorgeous
[name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] would be my second choice
[name_f]Sienna[/name_f] and [name_f]Juliet[/name_f]!
[name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u] is absolutely stunning. [name_u]Love[/name_u] it!
[name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u] is quite lovely.
[name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u] is my favourite. [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] would be next, followed by [name_u]Avery[/name_u] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]. I’m not a fan of [name_u]Hunter[/name_u] and [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] looks made up to me. [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] and [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] are lovely names though.
Definitely [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] or [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u]. They’re both lovely! I think I slightly prefer [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f].
I love [name_f]Juliet[/name_f], but I like it paired with [name_f]Rayne[/name_f] better than [name_u]Skye[/name_u]. I do prefer [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u] to [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] [name_f]Rayne[/name_f], though. [name_u]Hunter[/name_u] and [name_u]Avery[/name_u] are masculine names to me, so I would never use them on my daughter.
I think [name_u]Avery[/name_u] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is sweet! I also like [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_u]Skye[/name_u].
I’m not a fan of [name_f]Rayne[/name_f], and paired with [name_f]Sienna[/name_f] or [name_u]Hunter[/name_u], it’s a bit too much word for me. I think [name_f]Jane[/name_f] would be a good substitute. (It’s also more obviously feminine than [name_f]Rayne[/name_f], so it provides a better balance for [name_u]Hunter[/name_u]!)