Name group 1
[name_m]Finnigan[/name_m] [name_m]Hewitt[/name_m] and [name_m]Fitzgerald[/name_m] [name_m]Lawson[/name_m] nn [name_u]Finn[/name_u] and [name_m]Fitz[/name_m]
Name group 2
[name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] Wiles and [name_m]Seamus[/name_m] [name_m]Fletcher[/name_m] nn [name_m]Beau[/name_m] and [name_u]Shea[/name_u]
Name group 3
[name_u]Casey[/name_u] [name_m]Hendrix[/name_m] and [name_m]Anderson[/name_m] [name_u]Lee[/name_u] nn [name_m]Case[/name_m] and [name_m]Anders[/name_m]
Name group 4
[name_m]Rafferty[/name_m] [name_m]Sutter[/name_m] and [name_m]Clarence[/name_m] [name_m]Fisk[/name_m] nn Raf and [name_u]Clancy[/name_u]
Name group 5
[name_m]Hugh[/name_m] [name_u]Collins[/name_u] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u] [name_m]Hawthorne[/name_m]
Name group 6
[name_u]Remington[/name_u] [name_m]Kale[/name_m] and Allistair [name_m]Rawlings[/name_m] nn [name_u]Remi[/name_u] and [name_m]Al[/name_m]
Name group 7
[name_u]Ellington[/name_u] Rein and [name_u]Quincy[/name_u] [name_u]Gray[/name_u]
Name group 8
[name_m]Ramsey[/name_m] [name_u]Lorne[/name_u] and [name_m]Branigan[/name_m] [name_u]Lane[/name_u]
Name group 9
[name_u]Roux[/name_u]-land [name_u]Tate[/name_u] and [name_u]Gentry[/name_u] [name_u]Sinclair[/name_u]
Name group 10
[name_m]Wellington[/name_m] [name_f]Brier[/name_f] and Whitfield [name_m]Guy[/name_m]
As you can see me and my husband can’t decide or agree. Please help!
Name group 3
[name_u]Casey[/name_u] [name_m]Hendrix[/name_m] and [name_m]Anderson[/name_m] [name_u]Lee[/name_u] nn [name_m]Case[/name_m] and [name_m]Anders[/name_m]
Name group 5
[name_m]Hugh[/name_m] [name_u]Collins[/name_u] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u] [name_m]Hawthorne[/name_m]
Name group 4
[name_m]Rafferty[/name_m] [name_m]Sutter[/name_m] and [name_m]Clarence[/name_m] [name_m]Fisk[/name_m] nn Raf and [name_u]Clancy[/name_u]
Your style seems to include a lot, and some of the names seem a bit overwhelming to me for twins. However, I do see some names in there that I like alone. If I was permitted to re-arrange (not sure how you came up with your pairings) I would…
…Re-pair [name_u]Quincy[/name_u] [name_u]Gray[/name_u] and [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] [name_u]Collins[/name_u]
OR
… create [name_m]Rafferty[/name_m] [name_f]Brier[/name_f] and [name_m]Anderson[/name_m] [name_m]Kale[/name_m] from what you have listed.
My favorite is name group 3, [name_u]Casey[/name_u] [name_m]Hendrix[/name_m] & [name_m]Anderson[/name_m] [name_u]Lee[/name_u].
Some of your names are a little much for me (e.g. [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m], [name_u]Roux[/name_u]-land), that’s why I chose the relatively simple group 3.
I would go with
[name_u]Remington[/name_u] [name_m]Kale[/name_m] and Allistair [name_m]Rawlings[/name_m] nn [name_u]Remi[/name_u] and [name_m]Al[/name_m]
or
[name_m]Finnigan[/name_m] [name_m]Hewitt[/name_m] and [name_m]Fitzgerald[/name_m] [name_m]Lawson[/name_m] nn [name_u]Finn[/name_u] and [name_m]Fitz[/name_m]
My favourite “set” would be [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] [name_u]Collins[/name_u] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u] [name_m]Hawthorne[/name_m] - I think they’re both wonderful names. I also love [name_m]Rafferty[/name_m] with [name_m]Clarence[/name_m] (especially the nn [name_u]Clancy[/name_u]!).
If I could mix and match, I’d consider [name_m]Finnigan[/name_m] with [name_m]Rafferty[/name_m], and [name_u]Jude[/name_u] with Allistair.
I think that [name_u]Finn[/name_u] and [name_m]Fitz[/name_m] are too matchy, sorry (speaking as a twin here).
Good luck!
I like [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] & [name_u]Jude[/name_u], but would change [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] to [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]. Also, [name_m]Rafferty[/name_m] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u]/[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] would be nice
I love, love, love [name_u]Ellington[/name_u] and [name_u]Quincy[/name_u]. Those would be adorable twins!
I also really like [name_m]Seamus[/name_m] [name_m]Fletcher[/name_m] as a combo, but not with [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m]. It’s just too much. I would put [name_m]Seamus[/name_m] with [name_m]Finnegan[/name_m]…
I like [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u]! I have to admit, the other sets feel like a bit much. I like [name_m]Anderson[/name_m], but am not a fan of [name_u]Casey[/name_u]. [name_m]How[/name_m] about Finnigen and [name_m]Anderson[/name_m], nn [name_u]Finn[/name_u] and [name_m]Anders[/name_m]? Otherwise I thing [name_u]Jude[/name_u] and [name_m]Finnigan[/name_m] could work, since you plan on shortening it to [name_u]Finn[/name_u], which balances well with [name_u]Jude[/name_u].
I agree, [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] [name_u]Collins[/name_u] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u] [name_m]Hawthorne[/name_m] are lovely, but [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u] would be wonderful! I also like group 3, [name_u]Casey[/name_u] and [name_m]Anderson[/name_m] are great choices
They’re all interesting. I can’t decide, but I’d definitely replace mn [name_m]Kale[/name_m] with [name_u]Cade[/name_u] or something similar. Who wants to be named after a vegetable?
I’m findining it hard to pick but i do like [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] & [name_u]Jude[/name_u], also [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] & [name_u]Jude[/name_u] as suggested by pp. [name_u]Finn[/name_u] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u] or [name_u]Finn[/name_u] and [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] also are a great pairing. [name_u]Casey[/name_u] and [name_u]Finn[/name_u] go nicely together too.
I would love to see [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] and [name_m]Fitzgerald[/name_m] together. I also like [name_m]Seamus[/name_m] and [name_u]Gentry[/name_u] together. My favorite group as-is is [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] and [name_u]Jude[/name_u].
Out of those sets, I would definitely go with Group 1: [name_m]Finnigan[/name_m] [name_m]Hewitt[/name_m] and [name_m]Fitzgerald[/name_m] [name_m]Lawson[/name_m]