[name_u]Leigh[/name_u] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]
[name_u]Shea[/name_u] [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f]
[name_f]Brynn[/name_f] [name_f]Victoria[/name_f]
What do you all think?
[name_u]Leigh[/name_u] is okay, I prefer [name_u]Lee[/name_u]. I adore [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]. [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] [name_u]Leigh[/name_u]/[name_u]Lee[/name_u] would be gorgeous.
[name_u]Shea[/name_u] is cute. Are you pronouncing it SHE-uh or [name_u]SHAY[/name_u]-uh? [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f]'s not my favourite.
I don’t like [name_f]Brynn[/name_f], sorry. [name_f]Victoria[/name_f] is okay.
[name_u]Shea[/name_u] is pronounced shay
Not frilly enough for me.
I see. In that case, it’s nice, but not really my style. I love [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] off of your signature though. [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] or [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] would be beautiful.
I like [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] [name_f]Victoria[/name_f], if it were me I would spell it [name_u]Bryn[/name_u] Viktoriya.
I would switch the position of [name_u]Leigh[/name_u] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] to [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] [name_u]Leigh[/name_u]. I would keep [name_u]Leigh[/name_u] spelt like that and not [name_u]Lee[/name_u].
[name_u]Shea[/name_u] [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f] is okay. I like [name_u]Shea[/name_u]. I would have to agree with bibliophile that [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f] is not what I would go with.
I like [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] [name_f]Victoria[/name_f] best.
I also really love [name_f]Tess[/name_f] ([name_f]Tessa[/name_f]?) and [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] from your signature list.
I like [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] [name_f]Victoria[/name_f] the best, although the FNs are all much to unisex for my tastes. I [name_f]ADORE[/name_f] [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f] as a name, though, and would be happy to meet a little [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f] [name_f]Brynn[/name_f]/[name_f]Emmeline[/name_f] [name_u]Shea[/name_u].