You can’t go wrong with these, but wow, [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Redmond[/name_m] is stunning! I also really love [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Clay[/name_m].
I voted for [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m], but I also really love [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Redmond[/name_m] and [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]. [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Redmond[/name_m] flows particularly well to my ear. [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] is such a great name, I wish it got more attention!
I like [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] a lot but it sounds a bit vintage and serious. I voted for [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] because it has a nice flow to it, sounds more modern. Depends on the last name, too
Wallace [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]! But I really like [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] and am very intrigued by [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Redmond[/name_m] too.
From your latest poll I like just [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Redmond[/name_m] best. With all of these names having a solid, surnamey feel, I think three together risks sounding like a financial institution of some kind!
Thank you for your honest opinion my DH loves [name_m]Clay[/name_m] as a FN but I like it as a middle. [name_m]Clay[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] vs [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Clay[/name_m]. I also can’t seem to cross off [name_m]Redmond[/name_m]