[name]Noble[/name] [name]Sage[/name]
[name]Atlas[/name] Grae
Been loving these two names for boys lately. What do you guys think? [name]Do[/name] they sound like a good sibset? The Grae spelling is in honor of my little brother, [name]Brae[/name].
[name]Noble[/name] [name]Sage[/name]
[name]Atlas[/name] Grae
Been loving these two names for boys lately. What do you guys think? [name]Do[/name] they sound like a good sibset? The Grae spelling is in honor of my little brother, [name]Brae[/name].
[name]Atlas[/name] is one of my all-time favorite names. He’s a strong classic with an intriguing myth and solid history of use. [name]Noble[/name], on the other hand, strikes me as a thoroughly modern word name – and a rather snooty one at that (why not just call him “Aristocrat” or “[name]Jermajesty[/name]”?). I would pair [name]Atlas[/name] with another ancient name ([name]Evander[/name], [name]Pollux[/name]) or a word/occupation name like [name]Archer[/name], [name]Arrow[/name], or [name]Pilot[/name] – sleek, modern-sounding, with strong and interesting meanings.
[name]Noble[/name] is actually a virtue name with a long history of use. I really like it for a boy, even more so than [name]Atlas[/name]. [name]Both[/name] are perfectly nice and intriguing names, though.
I would consider longer middle names for [name]Noble[/name] and [name]Atlas[/name]. [name]Sage[/name] and Grae both feel like letdowns after such strong first names.
Thanks for the input! And you may be right about that. The more I think about it, the more I feel there aren’t enough syllables in either name. I think a longer middle would flow better with both.
And yes, [name]Noble[/name] is not a modern word name at all. In fact, it has a rather rich history of use.
“[name]Noble[/name] was actually on the Social Security list from at least 1880 to 1954, reaching as high as 312 in 1901.”
I love [name]Noble[/name] and [name]Atlas[/name]! So cool and handsome. I actually like the middles just fine. There’s no rule that says a name has to have a certain length to be great! I love the way [name]Sage[/name] and Grae sound with these names. [name]LOVE[/name]!
[name]Noble[/name] [name]Sage[/name] sounds too descriptive for me. Honestly neither names are my style but I can see them working ok in a sibset together.
ooh I love [name]Atlas[/name] and [name]Gray[/name] [this way]. I really love [name]Atlas[/name] [name]Gray[/name] as a combo would never think of that. I have [name]Atlas[/name] as a middle name though.
Thanks for the positive feedback dantea! I really love your bold and unique naming style so I think your positive feedback is awesome!
love both - [name]Noble[/name] can be hard to pair with a middle name, because it becomes descriptive (you can’t do a regular middle, like [name]Micheal[/name])
[name]Atlas[/name] is nice, what about [name]Atlas[/name] sterling, or [name]Atlas[/name] Merrick,
I like both names a lot and I think they go together well.
[name]Noble[/name]/[name]Atlas[/name]: I also like [name]Gable[/name], [name]Knox[/name], [name]Basil[/name], [name]Boyd[/name], [name]Gage[/name]
I know a little boy named [name]Noble[/name], so that gave the name a very positive association for me. It’s a family name for him, and he absolutely loves his name (except when people mistakenly spell it Nobel) and so do most of the people who meet him. I admit I was a little shocked by it at first but I really like it now. I think it goes well with [name]Atlas[/name], which I also love. [name]Atlas[/name] Grae is sweet, but I think [name]Noble[/name] [name]Sage[/name] is a little too descriptive for me. I get this mental image of an old, old wizard, kind of like a [name]Merlin[/name]/Gandalf figure.
lol Your [name]Welcome[/name] Jshores. Thanks for liking my style