I love old dictionaries (well, old books in general) and today I bought [name]Webster[/name]'s New Collegiate Dictionary copyrighted 1959. As I was flipping through it I saw a section titled Pronouncing Common English Given Names. It was really cool to look at some of the names that we wouldn’t think of as common nowadays, or ever. There were a lot of interesting ones that*included:
[name]Aloysius[/name]
[name]Chauncey[/name]
[name]Boniface[/name]
[name]Balthazar[/name]
[name]Ignatius[/name]
[name]Thurston[/name]
[name]Ethelbert[/name]
[name]Pius[/name]
[name]Silvanus[/name]
[name]Albina[/name]
Alphonsia
Aspasia
[name]Beata[/name]
[name]Dagmar[/name]
[name]Malvina[/name]
[name]Thekla[/name]/[name]Thecla[/name]
[name]Ulrica[/name]
[name]Urania[/name]
I was surprised by the amount of feminizations. There were also names that seemed extremely modern:
[name]Archer[/name]
[name]Dexter[/name]
[name]Ian[/name]
[name]Jock[/name] (Scottish form of [name]Jack[/name]; looks like the ultimate manly word name)
[name]Moss[/name]
[name]Myles[/name]/[name]Miles[/name] (yooneek anyone?)
[name]Pierce[/name]
[name]Rex[/name]
[name]Urban[/name]
[name]Zeke[/name]*
[name]Alix[/name]
[name]Honor[/name]
[name]Adele[/name]
Xina
There were also a lot of names we’d consider unisex on the males side (no big surprise there). Two I had never thought of being in the boys’ camp at all: [name]Esme[/name] and [name]Noel[/name]. So, what do you think? Does anyone else love dictionaries and words? It seems to go hand-in-hand, love of words and of names.*