I have my top two boy names
[name_m]Lyall[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m]
[name_m]Leo[/name_m] [name_m]Joseph[/name_m]
Please tell me if you like.love,or hate these names and why.
I want a lot of long specific comments.
Please comment than!!!
Out of the two, I like [name_m]Leo[/name_m] [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] better. I think they’re both decent names and they both flow well. Neither of them are too trendy or too confusing. Really, they’re both excellent names. I only like [name_m]Leo[/name_m] [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] better because [name_m]Leo[/name_m] is more my style, but I still think that [name_m]Lyall[/name_m] is cute. They’d both make good names.
I like both, but I like the standard spelling, [name_u]Lyle[/name_u], better.
Lyail looks like a kreative spelling to me so I prefer [name_m]Leo[/name_m] [name_m]Joseph[/name_m]. I do like [name_u]Lyle[/name_u] [name_m]John[/name_m].
Since [name_m]Leo[/name_m] seems more trendy, I slightly prefer [name_u]Lyle[/name_u] over [name_m]Leo[/name_m].
I’m not a fan of [name_m]Lyall[/name_m] (or [name_u]Lyle[/name_u]), but I love [name_m]Leo[/name_m] [name_m]Joseph[/name_m].
I think [name_u]Lyle[/name_u] (correct spelling) would be a very fresh choice today. [name_m]Leo[/name_m] is one of my faves but getting popular.
[name_m]Both[/name_m] are lovely but I prefer [name_u]Lyle[/name_u] over [name_m]Lyall[/name_m] significantly better. I have a name list of names we will use in the future and [name_u]Lyle[/name_u] and [name_m]Leo[/name_m] would make it but for personal conflicts. We like them enough. [name_m]Lyall[/name_m] seems forced and there isn’t really any reason to spell it that unless its a family name or that’s how its spelled where you live. [name_m]Both[/name_m] first names start with the same letter and are 2 syllables so if you’re going for two similar names you’ve got that . The middle names are classic biblical names both syRting with j that are commonly used . Of the let us say 2 dozen or so children born at our hospital last month wets say 1/3 were boys , of the boys about 2/3 had [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] as one of their names and a few had [name_m]John[/name_m], no one would have an issue with a name so understatedly classic that it doesn’t even come across as ‘too’ popular. I believe there is also a [name_f]Josephine[/name_f]. And a [name_m]Leo[/name_m] or 2 but no [name_u]Lyle[/name_u] last month, though not unheard of.