This is my first post on Nameberry, so please let me know if I am breaking any rules or posting in the wrong place or anything!!
I love these names:
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m]
[name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u]
Also:
[name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]
And also on the list for first/middle name are:
[name_u]Milo[/name_u]
[name_m]Brandon[/name_m]
[name_m]Harrison[/name_m]
What do you think, and what combos do you like/dislike?
I really like [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m], [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] and [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]! Maybe the spelling [name_u]Elliott[/name_u] is more common?
I also really like [name_m]Harrison[/name_m]… Maybe [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Harrison[/name_m], or [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]?
Harrison [name_u]James[/name_u] is amazing!
I like [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] and [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m]
Theodore [name_m]John[/name_m] and [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] are fantastic.
I’d personally spell it [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Elliot[/name_u] rather than [name_u]Eliot[/name_u].
Milo, [name_m]Brandon[/name_m] and [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] aren’t my personal style but they’re fine and work well with [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] and [name_m]Christopher[/name_m].
I like [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u]! [name_u]Milo[/name_u] and [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] are also great. What about [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u], [name_m]Brandon[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u], or [name_u]Milo[/name_u] [name_m]Brandon[/name_m]?
Here to give a third vote for [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]! So classic and strong. [name_u]Love[/name_u] it!
Welcome to nameberry!
You’ve a great name list. I personally love [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u].
Christopher [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] is so balanced between strong and gentle
Theodore [name_m]John[/name_m] feels classic and regal
Christopher [name_u]James[/name_u] is nice but [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] makes a more interesting combo
Milo and [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] are great! [name_u]Milo[/name_u] [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] would make a great combo. Or even [name_u]Miles[/name_u] [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] nn [name_u]Milo[/name_u]
Welcome to Nameberry! I really love your taste 
Theodore [name_m]John[/name_m] is so handsome and versatile; I love that a [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] could be [name_u]Theo[/name_u] or [name_u]Teddy[/name_u] or [name_m]Ted[/name_m] if he wanted.
Christopher [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] feels lovely and literary! I love the flow of [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] too but [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] is definitely a little more interesting in the middle spot than [name_u]James[/name_u]. I love it with classic [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] up front.
Harrison would fit really well with [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] and [name_m]Christopher[/name_m], all three long-ish, traditional, handsome names. Maybe [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m], [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] and [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] [name_u]Miles[/name_u]?
I love [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m]. I think [name_u]Milo[/name_u] [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] would be a great combination!
Hi there.
Here are my thoughts-
Theodore [name_m]John[/name_m]-[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] is a darling name. It’s smart, quirky, friendly, classic & has a bunch of great nns. [name_u]Theo[/name_u], [name_u]Teddy[/name_u], [name_m]Thatch[/name_m], Thax, [name_m]Thad[/name_m], [name_m]Tad[/name_m]. [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] is getting pretty poplar if that bothers you. [name_m]John[/name_m] isn’t my personal favorite, but I think that it sounds nice enough as a mn here.
Christopher [name_u]Eliot[/name_u]-Are you spelling it [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] because of T.S. [name_u]Eliot[/name_u]? If so, I like it! I like it spelled this way either way. I also like [name_u]Elliott[/name_u]. But anyway, [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] is very handsome. [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] is a little over done the past 60ish? years. I think that [name_u]Chris[/name_u] sounds dated, but I love the nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u].
Christopher [name_u]James[/name_u]-Very nice, but [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] is a bit more interesting.
Milo-Super cute. Similar vibe to [name_m]Theodore[/name_m]. A little less common, & doesn’t have the fun nn possibilities.
Brandon-I find it a little 80s/90s, but I still like it a lot. It’s handsome & polished, kind & a little sporty.
Harrison-I think that I like this in theory more than the actual sound. It’s strong & interesting; just a little heavy. I love the idea of the nn [name_m]Hank[/name_m].
Hope this helps. 
Both [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m] and [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] are wonderful, and would make wonderful brothers. I really love the sweet feel of [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]Eliot[/name_u] and I love that spelling in the middle spot.
as pp have mention [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] fits right in there with the two. [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] [name_u]Milo[/name_u] would be a lovely addition to the group.
Brandon is nice too, but doesn’t shine like [name_m]Theodore[/name_m], [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] and [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] to me.