Hey berries, I’ve come up with my Top 3. What do you think?
[name]Mason[/name] [name]James[/name]
[name]Adam[/name] [name]David[/name]
[name]Daniel[/name] [name]Joseph[/name]
Also, is this a cute twin set?
[name]Mason[/name] [name]James[/name] & [name]Megan[/name] [name]Jane[/name]
[name]Mason[/name] [name]James[/name] - I am not a fan of the name [name]Mason[/name] but it does sound nice with [name]James[/name]. [name]James[/name] is a really typical middle name though.
[name]Adam[/name] [name]David[/name] - Sounds strong. I like [name]Adam[/name]. Maybe a little 90’s, but it works.
[name]Daniel[/name] [name]Joseph[/name] - Very classic combo. I love [name]Daniel[/name]. [name]Joseph[/name] is just ok for me.
Separately [name]Mason[/name] [name]James[/name] and [name]Megan[/name] [name]Jane[/name] are good combinations, but I wouldn’t name my twins something so similar sounding. [name]Both[/name] first names start with M and end in N. The middle names also are very matchy - one syllable J names whose pronunciations sound similar as well. I guess if you really like them sounding that… matchy then they’re good names, but matchiness is something that’s definitely not my style.
I think your top 3 is solid- not really my style, but definitely solid. [name]Mason[/name] is surprisingly popular though… but not so much timeless like the other two. [name]Daniel[/name] [name]Joseph[/name] is especially handsome, and I love [name]Adam[/name], too.
[name]Mason[/name] [name]James[/name] & [name]Megan[/name] [name]Jane[/name] are way too cutesy together for me. I do like [name]Megan[/name] [name]Jane[/name] and [name]Mason[/name] [name]James[/name] individually, but they’re matchy-matchy, which isn’t my cup of tea. Something like [name]Nolan[/name] [name]James[/name] & [name]Megan[/name] [name]Jane[/name] would really get the thumbs up from me. [name]Nolan[/name] & [name]Mason[/name] has a similar construction, just [name]Nolan[/name] is less trendy, and one step further away from being so matchy with [name]Megan[/name].