[name]Hi[/name],
I think that [name]Seraphina[/name] is very beautiful, but I would never use it. In my opinion it is sadly a GP name. I love the nn [name]Fee[/name].
What do you think?
Thank you,
[name]Ellie[/name] xx
I think this name has an otherworldly charm - which makes it too good to fit into reality. Only [name]Angelina[/name] [name]Jolie[/name] could have carried off that grand beautiful name. It reminded me of Nymphadora Tonks from [name]Harry[/name] [name]Potter[/name] - a name so unpractical that the lady prefers to be known by her surname 
I quite like it. It appeals to me because it’s also a saint’s name, so it wouldn’t seem weird in my family if I did use it. It’s a little odd, but I see a [name]Seraphina[/name] as a sporty girl that can have a feminine side, but doesn’t show it. I think with the amount of nicknames it can have, it is very doable in real life. For me, I have it in a couple of combos as a middle name, but I wouldn’t rule it out as a first name.
I love it, except I would only use it in the middle name spot because I do not want people calling her [name]Sarah[/name] for short. I really dislike nicknames. And we actually do have a combo with [name]Serafina[/name] (spelt this way) in the middle spot.
I adore [name]Seraphina[/name]. I find it so lovely with a mystical, flowery sound to it. I love the saint/biblical connotation. I like Phina as a nickname.