Respondents: 54 (This poll is closed)
I prefer [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] but if you insist on [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f], then [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f].
I like [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f], but I don’t like [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] with it. I also would not immediately pronounce [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] as [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] (although you prefer it spelt like that, so pronunciation issues can be easily rectified).
Other suggestions:
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Leila[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Victoria[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Anise[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] (this may be a bit too floral though)
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Aurelie[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Maisie[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Bethany[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Madeleine[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Molly[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Melanie[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
If you love [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] though, go for it, it is a very pretty name.
[name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] is confusing. Is it really [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] or Scar lette? I would use [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f]
I really like the whole name but I would spell [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] like this.
I am not fond of [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] no matter how it’s spelled. I adore [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] but only feel neutral about other “[name_f]Georgia[/name_f]” names. I think [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is beautiful, spunky, and Sweet. [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] would still honor your friend.
I would flip them and drop the [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f]. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] would still honor your friend, give baby her own name, and [name_f]Rose[/name_f] as a first name is so lovely and unexpected.
I love the [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Scarlett/name_f part… I might change [name_f]Rose[/name_f] if anything, because [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] kind of doubles up on the colors. But overall it’s very nice!
I like it although I would give my baby her own name and still use [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] in the middle. I love [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] so would suggest [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f].
A beautiful combination! As a first name, I would spell it [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f]. But in the middle spot [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] looks lovely! A top notch combo!
I like [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] (unexpected classic revival name) and [name_f]Rose[/name_f] (timeless, lovely). To be honest, I’ve just never been a fan of [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f]/[name_f]Scarlette[/name_f]. And with [name_f]Rose[/name_f], it does seem a bit like “red rose”–if you want to keep [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] (because many people [name_f]DO[/name_f] love this name, so no reason to go by my opinion) I would do [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] instead.
I also like the suggestion of [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] as a way to change the name a bit while still honoring your friend.
Other ideas could be:
[name_f]Georgia[/name_f] or [name_f]Georgiana[/name_f] in space of [name_f]Georgina[/name_f], or even something like [name_f]Jordana[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] or [name_f]Giovana[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] which are more different, but sill inspired by your friend’s name.
You could also keep [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] and use a variation on [name_f]Rose[/name_f]:
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalie[/name_f]
[name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Rosemarie[/name_f]
etc.
Sounds like a beautiful Southern [name_f]Belle[/name_f]. It’s the perfect combo.
If I was choosing for you, I’d use [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] (I don’t like the -ette ending, but if it makes sense for you then so be it). [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is very literal, and [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] has a nice flow and is very sweet.
If you have to include [name_f]Rose[/name_f], I would flip them and use [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. I think [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] as an honorific is a lot. It works a little better if the baby’s own name comes first, especially when the honoree is still alive and around the child.
I think that honoring your best friend is so sweet! The only thing that I didn’t like about the name was how [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] was spelled. I prefer [name_f]Scarlet[/name_f], but overall I think that the name has a great flow to it!!
So many helpful comments and opinions. Thank you!
I thought I would clarify a point, that might help some understanding… I know that a lot of people don’t like names that sound descriptive or like they could be part of a sentence (e.g. [name_u]Winter[/name_u] [name_f]Snow[/name_f], [name_f]Amber[/name_f] [name_u]Wren[/name_u], [name_f]Holly[/name_f] [name_f]Belle[/name_f], ect), but my best friend is an artist, a herbalist, and alternative spiritualist. To me, [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] sums up her beauty, deep, and intrigue. It sounds like something from a [name_f]Gypsy[/name_f] novel, with mysterious ladies in corsets and jingling jewels. So to me, it is a perfect fit. <3
I hope that helps show where my thoughts were at when putting the name together.
Awww… thanks 
Thank you Your exuberance about it makes me smile.
I also prefer [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] over [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f], but use the spelling you feel most comfortable with. I agree that the [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] part sounds like a description, and it’d be even moreso if you used [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] instead of [name_f]Georgina[/name_f], which I would personally avoid but that’s fine if you’re okay with it. Most people wouldn’t know her middle names anyways. It definitely gives off the imagery of “something from a [name_f]Gypsy[/name_f] novel, with mysterious ladies in corsets and jingling jewels” as you say. It does sound very Southern to me as a PP said- [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] makes me think of [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] and [name_f]Scarlett/name_f of [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] O’[name_f]Hara[/name_f]. It’s great that you’re honouring your best friend- she sounds like a very interesting person to know! 
I do love it, I would just use an alternative spelling for [name_f]Scarlette[/name_f]. [name_f]Scarlet[/name_f] or [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] look more appealing to me.
Maybe [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Scarlett[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] or [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Velvet[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] or [name_f]Georgina[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]?