Right now we are TTC and narrowing down our list WDYT??
[name_m]Archer[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m] nn AJ
[name_u]Everett[/name_u] [name_m]Richard[/name_m] nn [name_m]Rhett[/name_m]
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]Grady[/name_u] nn [name_u]Theo[/name_u]
Ollivander [name_m]Brian[/name_m] nn [name_m]Vander[/name_m]
[name_m]Declan[/name_m] [name_u]Royce[/name_u]
[name_u]Sawyer[/name_u] [name_u]Michael[/name_u]
[name_f]TIA[/name_f]
[name_m]Archer[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m] nn AJ - these two don’t flow very well together. “J” middle names aren’t the best with [name_m]Archer[/name_m].
[name_u]Everett[/name_u] [name_m]Richard[/name_m] nn [name_m]Rhett[/name_m] - back-to-back r’s aren’t ideal for flow. [name_u]Everett[/name_u] [name_m]John[/name_m] would be better.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]Grady[/name_u] nn [name_u]Theo[/name_u] - I love the stately [name_m]Theodore[/name_m].
Ollivander [name_m]Brian[/name_m] nn [name_m]Vander[/name_m] - this just looks like a bad mix of [name_m]Oliver[/name_m] and [name_m]Alexander[/name_m]. The originals are wonderful so why mess with them? [name_m]Evander[/name_m] [name_m]Brian[/name_m] would be my pick.
[name_m]Declan[/name_m] [name_u]Royce[/name_u] - Ok but the names together sound a bit harsh
[name_u]Sawyer[/name_u] [name_u]Michael[/name_u] - spunk and tradition in this pairing
[name_m]Archer[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m] - I love both names but the two together sounds better turned around, [name_m]John[/name_m] [name_m]Archer[/name_m]. I have [name_m]Archer[/name_m] [name_u]Finley[/name_u] on my list.
[name_u]Everett[/name_u] [name_m]Richard[/name_m] nn [name_m]Rhett[/name_m] - I love [name_u]Everett[/name_u] and [name_m]Rhett[/name_m]. I find [name_u]Everett[/name_u] [name_m]Richard[/name_m] a bit hard to say. I have [name_u]Gray[/name_u] [name_u]Everett[/name_u] on my list, [name_u]Everett[/name_u] [name_u]Gray[/name_u] would be nice also.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]Grady[/name_u] - [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]Grady[/name_u] is a very nice combo. I love the nickname [name_m]Ted[/name_m], [name_u]Teddy[/name_u], and [name_m]Bear[/name_m].
Ollivander [name_m]Brian[/name_m] nn [name_m]Vander[/name_m] - I do not care for either names or the nickname. Sorry.
[name_m]Declan[/name_m] [name_u]Royce[/name_u] - I love [name_m]Declan[/name_m]. This is a nice combo.
[name_u]Sawyer[/name_u] [name_u]Michael[/name_u] - [name_m]Even[/name_m] though I feel neutral about [name_u]Michael[/name_u], [name_u]Sawyer[/name_u] [name_u]Michael[/name_u] is a very nice combo.
[name_m]Archer[/name_m] [name_m]John[/name_m] nn AJ - I like this. Could flow a bit better, but if AJ is what you’re after, it works. Not sure if [name_m]John[/name_m] is a family name, but [name_m]Archer[/name_m] [name_u]Jude[/name_u] sounds better, imo.
[name_u]Everett[/name_u] [name_m]Richard[/name_m] nn [name_m]Rhett[/name_m] - love [name_u]Everett[/name_u]. I am neutral on the combo and the nickname.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]Grady[/name_u] nn [name_u]Theo[/name_u] - I love [name_m]Theodore[/name_m]/[name_u]Theo[/name_u]. Again, neutral on [name_u]Grady[/name_u] and the combo.
Ollivander [name_m]Brian[/name_m] nn [name_m]Vander[/name_m] - I second [name_m]Evander[/name_m]! Much less of a mouthful. [name_m]Evander[/name_m] [name_m]Brian[/name_m] is handsome, and I like [name_u]Van[/name_u] or [name_m]Vander[/name_m] as a nn.
[name_m]Declan[/name_m] [name_u]Royce[/name_u] - nice. very similar to [name_m]Declan[/name_m] [name_u]Rhys[/name_u], which has been on my list.
[name_u]Sawyer[/name_u] [name_u]Michael[/name_u] - I really like [name_u]Sawyer[/name_u]. It is fine with [name_u]Michael[/name_u].
Aside from Ollivander, I love all of your first names!