As far as FNs go, I like the sound of [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Wallace[/name] more than the others. [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] seems to flow the best of the two remaining options.
[name]Chloe[/name] [name]Abigail[/name] and [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] are gorgeous, but I prefer the latter combo as [name]Magnolia[/name] balances the commonness of [name]Chloe[/name].
I voted for [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name]. It’s lovely, and [name]Magnolia[/name] adds personality and interest to the mega popular [name]Chloe[/name].
[name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] - [name]Chloe[/name] is not one of my favourite names but I [name]LOVE[/name] this combination and voted for this
[name]Chloe[/name] [name]Abigail[/name] - has nothing on [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] [name]IMO[/name]
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Rayne[/name] - I love [name]Sienna[/name] but don’t like [name]Rayne[/name] with it. [name]Sienna[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] is adorable
[name]Juliette[/name] [name]Hope[/name] - is a lovely name but doesn’t have the WOW factor as some of your other names
I voted for [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name]. [name]Magnolia[/name] really adds a spark to [name]Chloe[/name] whereas the other combinations seem lackluster in comparison.
I’m in the minority here - I chose [name]Sienna[/name] [name]Rayne[/name]. Mostly because I really dislike the name [name]Chloe[/name]. I agree with milenaviolet - [name]Sienna[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] sounds great!
I voted for [name]Juliette[/name] [name]Hope[/name] (although I prefer [name]Juliet[/name])-- although I think [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] works well, I’m just not a [name]Chloe[/name] fan and [name]Sienna[/name] is nms. Does [name]Zoe[/name] hold any appeal? [name]Zoe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name] [name]Wallace[/name] would work well.
I like [name]Juliette[/name] in the first slot, but ‘[name]Hope[/name]’ strikes me as a filler middle.
[name]Chloe[/name] is very, very popular, and I dislike the trendy and misspelled [name]Rayne[/name].
Really like pp’s suggestion of [name]Juliette[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name]-- you want something stressed on the middle syllable (ju-li-ETTE mag-NOL-ya [name]WALL[/name]-ace) so two stressed syllables are never next to each other. [name]Sienna[/name] works well too, if [name]Magnolia[/name] is too daring.
I voted for [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Magnolia[/name]. While I like the name [name]Abigail[/name], I think [name]Magnolia[/name] works better as a middle to [name]Chloe[/name]. [name]Sienna[/name] is simply NMS, and while I adore the name [name]Rain[/name], I prefer it spelled that way. As for [name]Juliette[/name] [name]Hope[/name]…this one almost got my vote, as I very much like both of these names (though I’d spell it [name]Juliet[/name]). What did it for me was the hard ending consonant on [name]Juliette[/name] next to a soft initial consonant on [name]Hope[/name]. It’s a bit linguistically awkward.
I voted [name]Juliette[/name] [name]Hope[/name]. I like this name and I like the combo.
I am surprised by how many people picked these names by the middle names. [name]Chloe[/name] is fine just know its falling out the top ten most popular names. As for the middles, remember most people will know her as [name]Chloe[/name] [name]Wallace[/name] or [name]Chloe[/name] W., [name]Juliette[/name] [name]Wallace[/name], or [name]Sienna[/name] [name]Wallace[/name]. I like [name]Sienna[/name] but it doesn’t go the best with your last name. Good [name]Luck[/name]!