- [name_f][/name_f]
- [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
- [name_f]Rosa[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
- [name_f]Rosella[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
- [name_f]Rosalina[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
- [name_f]Rosalinda[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- [name_f]My[/name_f] daughter’s name is [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. [name_f][/name_f] I think it’s classic and works well for a baby and an adult. [name_f][/name_f] It’s sophisticated and pretty. [name_f][/name_f] The one syllable is nice. [name_f][/name_f] Many names would work as a middle name.
[name_f][/name_f][name_f]Rosa[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- Still classic, but has a Spanish or Italian flare.
[name_f][/name_f][name_f]Rosella[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- Nice combination of [name_f]Rose[/name_f] and [name_f]Ella[/name_f].
[name_f][/name_f][name_f]Rosalina[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- [name_m]Four[/name_m] syllables may be too much. [name_f][/name_f] You’d probably call her “Rosa”.
[name_f][/name_f][name_f]Rosalinda[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- “Linda” seems a little dated.