Rank These Twin Sets

Rank each twin-set from 1-10.

*Not looking for new names. Trying to narrow down to final 2.

[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]

1 Like

Amelia & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - 10
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 6
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 5
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - 5
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 6
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - 8
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 7
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 6
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 5
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 4

1 Like

Eleanor & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 10/10
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 9/10
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - 9/10
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 4/10
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - 5/10
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 5/10
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - 5/10
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 6/10
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 4/10
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 4/10

1 Like

Amelia & Eleanor - 10/10
Amelia & Jane - 9/10
Amelia & Lola - 5/10
Audrey & Eva - 3/10
Audrey & Lola - 4/10
Eleanor & Eva - 6/10
Eleanor & Jane - 7/10
Eva & Jane - 5/10
Eva & Lola - 8/10
Lola & Jane - 7/10

(Ten being the highest is how I did this)

1 Like

Eva and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] 10/10 I love this soo much

1 Like

[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & Eleanor - 10/10
Amelia & Jane - 7/10
Amelia & Lola - 6/10
Audrey & Eva - 4/10
Audrey & Lola - 9/10
Eleanor & Eva - 4/10
Eleanor & Jane - 9/10
Eva & Jane - 4/10
Eva & Lola - 4/10
Lola & Jane - 9/10

10 is the highest!

1 Like

Amelia & Eleanor - 6
Amelia & Jane-6
Amelia & Lola-6
Audrey & Eva-9
Audrey & Lola-9
Eleanor & Eva-8
Eleanor & Jane-7
Eva & Jane-8
Eva & Lola-9
Lola & Jane-7


I love [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Eva[/name_f] together very much but let’s look at how frequently each name is used in the pairings you’ve made:

Amelia: 3
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]: 3
[name_f]Jane[/name_f]: 4
[name_f]Lola[/name_f]: 4
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f]: 2
[name_f]Eva[/name_f]: 4

It seems subconsciously that [name_f]Jane[/name_f], [name_f]Eva[/name_f],
and [name_f]Lola[/name_f] are your front runners. In this case, I believe [name_f]Jane[/name_f] and [name_f]Eva[/name_f] should be your choice. [name_f]Lola[/name_f] seems drastically different stylistically to either choice imo whereas [name_f]Jane[/name_f] and [name_f]Eva[/name_f] sounds great and match up stylistically.

And to actually do as you requested:
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]; these match up nicely in style, length, and syllable count, 9/10
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]: fitting style wise but they don’t match up too well as far as length or syllable count, 6/10
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]: [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] feels very buttoned up with the option to be playful whereas [name_f]Lola[/name_f] only seems playful with no alternative, also a lot of L going on here, 2/10
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f]: matching in style and syllable count but not in length-even still I love how they sound together, 8/10
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]: again style doesn’t match but syllable count does, not sure how I feel about this one, 5/10
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f]: I think I’d prefe [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] to [name_f]Eva[/name_f] here, still I’d rather not have the same initials and I don’t love them together, so 5/10
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]: fitting style wise but not syllable count or length, still they seem like they’d be sisters, 6/10
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]: matching length and style wise, syllable count isn’t a huge difference, this is really nice, 9/10
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]: syllable count and length match but style isn’t there for me, one extra point over [name_f]Lola[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] because I could see this working on Hispanic twins 5/10
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]: again the style is the problem for me, 4/10


Not sure if this is what you wanted, but I put 1 as the best and 10 as the worst.

Amelia and [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - 5/10
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 7/10 (this means it’s worse, right?)
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] and [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 4/10
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - 7/10
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 4/10
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 5/10
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 7/10
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] and [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 1/10 (it’s so amazing!!)
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 5/10

1 Like

This is a very good point! There are definitely some that I prefer in certain pairs. And some that I can put anywhere. A thing to consider for sure.

1 Like
  1. Amelia and [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - I just love this pairing so much!
  2. Amelia and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - Both of these names feel warm and vintage.
  3. Eleanor and [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - Matchy initials, but distinct sounds otherwise, which I always think makes a nice set.
  4. Eleanor and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - I like both of these names for you, and they’re nice together if not my very favorite pairing.
  5. Lola and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - Such different personalities, but the same length so I kind of like them as an odd duck set.
  6. Audrey and [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - Feels very classic and glamorous, but a little bit harsh.
  7. Audrey and [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - These next three are tied, probably.
  8. Eva and [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
  9. Amelia and [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
  10. Eva and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - I don’t know why I don’t vibe with these two together but it’s just a mismatch to me!

Eleanor & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 10/10 (so charming together!)
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 9.5/10 (still lovely, but not quite as perfect of a match.)
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - 8/10 (I know you’re not looking for suggestions, but I do like [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] for this pairing.)
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - 7.5 (Both are pretty, classic names.)
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 7/10 (I don’t love either name, but I think they go together nicely.)
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Eva[/name_f] - 7/10 (Opposite to previous, I enjoy both names, but can’t really picture them together.)
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 6/10 (This is fun pairing, but it doesn’t wow me, it is a solid choice, though.)
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 3/10 (maybe [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is too classic and underused in modern times for [name_f]Amelia[/name_f]?)
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f] - 2/10 (way too matchy for me.)
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - 1/10 (I cannot see these two together at all, their vibes and sounds are too different.)

Good luck finding your perfect pairing!

Okay! Here are my thoughts-

Amelia & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]-If you take popularity out of the equation, these are absolutely stunning & perfect. I love them both so much. And their style totally matches. [name_u]Strong[/name_u], feminine, vintage, bold, adventurous, all of the good qualities! Popularity is the only downside, but it just depends on how much that bothers you.

Amelia & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]-[name_f]Jane[/name_f] is less common, & it’s a nice name. It’s just not as good as [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] in my opinion. For lack of a better word, it’s a bit plain.

Amelia & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]-[name_f]Lola[/name_f] is really cute, but I find it kind of nick-namey. It’s just a little spunky & non substantial next to [name_f]Amelia[/name_f]. I don’t think that [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] nn [name_f]Lola[/name_f] would be too much of a stretch. [name_f]Eloisa[/name_f], [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] or [name_f]Lorelei[/name_f] also work. I love [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]. [name_f]Mia[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]? I don’t know if you like [name_f]Mia[/name_f], but those would be darling! Sorry if that’s suggesting a new name. :blush:

Audrey & [name_f]Eva[/name_f]-I really like [name_f]Audrey[/name_f]. I think it’s sweet & quiet, but also has this glamorous vibe ala [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] Hepburn. [name_f]Eva[/name_f] is okay. It doesn’t sparkle for me, & every other little girl I meet has some kind of ‘Ev’ name. I prefer [name_f]Ava[/name_f]. It’s a little sassier.

Eleanor & [name_f]Eva[/name_f]-These are good, but unless it was your absolute favorite pair by a mile, I’d suggest having two different first initials.

Eleanor & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]-[name_f]Lovely[/name_f], but I still think that [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] are better.

Eva & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]-Good, but not that special.

Eva & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]-I like these together the most of your [name_f]Eva[/name_f] pairings. With a twin called [name_f]Lola[/name_f], it makes [name_f]Eva[/name_f] a little more spunky.

Lola & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]-[name_f]Jane[/name_f] seems too quiet next to [name_f]Lola[/name_f] for me.

Hope this helps. :slight_smile:

This was very detailed + helpful! I knew this would take me time to find the best set. But the berries here have been so great and definitely making it easier.

My favourites:

  1. Eva & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
  2. Audrey & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
  3. Audrey & [name_f]Eva[/name_f]
1 Like

Amelia and [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] or [name_f]Lola[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] if you wanted shorter names.

1 Like

from favorite to least favorite:

Eva & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Audrey[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]

I really like all these names except for [name_f]Lola[/name_f], so aside from the [name_f]Lola[/name_f] combos I basically just went by flow.

1 Like

Amelia and [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f], totally!

1 Like

Amelia & [name_f]Jane[/name_f]: 10/10
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] & [name_f]Lola[/name_f]: 10/10

1 Like

I would rank them in this order:

Amelia and [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_f]Amelia[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] and [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Eva[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Lola[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] and [name_f]Lola[/name_f]

I really like [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Jane[/name_f] together too!

1 Like