Rate my names PT.2

[name_m]Hi[/name_m] berries! These are combos that I’ve forgotten to put on my last post.

[name_f]Stella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f]
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
[name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_u]Monroe[/name_u]
[name_m]Bowie[/name_m] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]
Wrenly [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Erica[/name_f] [name_f]Noelle[/name_f]
[name_f]Vienna[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f]
Danicia [name_f]Maeve[/name_f]
[name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Marigold[/name_f]
[name_f]Libby[/name_f] [name_u]June[/name_u]
[name_f]Celia[/name_f] [name_u]Haven[/name_u]
[name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] [name_f]Fern[/name_f]
[name_f]Odette[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Ruth[/name_f] [name_f]Alessandra[/name_f]

[name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_u]Monroe[/name_u] - absolute fave!!!

Wrenly [name_f]Rose[/name_f] - unique, I haven’t heard it before, I like it!

Favorites are [name_f]Stella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f], [name_f]Vienna[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f], and [name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Marigold[/name_f]!

[name_f]Stella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] -pretty and full of flair. [name_f]Stella[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] would be cute too

[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] -amazing!! [name_u]Love[/name_u] it!!
[name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_u]Monroe[/name_u] -a bit surnamey together for me. [name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_f]Margot[/name_f], [name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_u]Ruby[/name_u], [name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_f]Cleo[/name_f], [name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_f]Mabel[/name_f]?

[name_m]Bowie[/name_m] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] -balanced and funky

[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] -classic and pretty

Wrenly [name_f]Rose[/name_f] - I find this hard to say. Wrenly (of [name_f]Wrenley[/name_f]) is cute. Wrenly Elizabetg, Wrenly [name_f]Beth[/name_f], [name_f]Wrenley[/name_f] [name_f]Maeve[/name_f], Wrenly [name_f]Alice[/name_f], Wrenly [name_f]Jade[/name_f]?

[name_f]Erica[/name_f] [name_f]Noelle[/name_f] -pretty and unexpected

[name_f]Vienna[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f] -sleek and pretty

Danicia [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] - [name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_f]Maeve[/name_f], not wild on Danicia

[name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Marigold[/name_f] -stunning!

[name_f]Libby[/name_f] [name_u]June[/name_u] -bouncy, bright and cute

[name_f]Celia[/name_f] [name_u]Haven[/name_u] -delightful and warm!!

[name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] [name_f]Fern[/name_f] -unexpected and intersting

[name_f]Odette[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] - balanced and lovely

[name_f]Ruth[/name_f] [name_f]Alessandra[/name_f] -full of flair but also grounded!!

[name_f]Stella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] and [name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Marigold[/name_f] are the standouts for me - both fantastic combos. To make it a top five, I’d add [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f], [name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] & [name_f]Libby[/name_f] [name_u]June[/name_u].

I haven’t seen your last post so have no idea how you want me to rate them, but what a lovely list!! My favourites are…

[name_m]Bowie[/name_m] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] - I’m not overly loving [name_m]Bowie[/name_m] on a girl but I can appreciate its modern and sassy appeal. The classic, feminine [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] as a middle makes for a pefectly-balanced and ecclectic combo.

Wrenly [name_f]Rose[/name_f] - Wrenly is stunning and spunky, and I adore the pairing with the more common [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. I adore it! I have to say, I’m a sucker for alliteration too. The whole combo just strikes a lovely balance between vinage and modern, it’s stunning.

[name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Marigold[/name_f] - This one has a more vintage feel than my other favourites from your list. I like the subtleness of the nature connection in [name_f]Lyra[/name_f], allowing for not only stunning imagery (golden stars and yellow marigolds - how much more magical can you get?!) but also for a double-nature combo which doesn’t feel cheesy/over the top.

[name_m]Hi[/name_m] again!

Here are my thoughts on these:

[name_f]Stella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f]-I absolutely love this. It’s stunning. Dramatic, feminine, classy, not super complicated. I think that I’d possibly love [name_f]Estella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] a bit more, but maybe that’s just because [name_f]Estella[/name_f] is less common. And a little fancier. [name_f]Stella[/name_f] is more sassy, which isn’t bad at all! I just love [name_f]Estella[/name_f].

[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]-So cute! Old fashioned, sweet & a little spunky. I love [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f], & this has a great flow.

[name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_u]Monroe[/name_u]-Hm. This seems a bit trendy & sort of harsh.

[name_m]Bowie[/name_m] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]-I don’t care much for [name_m]Bowie[/name_m] for a girl.

[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]-This is a good solid strong classic. I don’t personally love [name_f]Harriet[/name_f], but I appreciate it & want to like it. I do think that the nn [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] is adorable.

Wrenly [name_f]Rose[/name_f]-This is a bit of a tongue twister. Wrenly seems a bit made up. I don’t care for it.

[name_f]Erica[/name_f] [name_f]Noelle[/name_f]-This has a nice flow & is fine. [name_f]Erica[/name_f] just seems a bit dated in my opinion.

[name_f]Vienna[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f]-I’ve never given much thought to the name [name_f]Vienna[/name_f], but this is kind of pretty. I love the nn [name_f]Vivie[/name_f].

Danicia [name_f]Maeve[/name_f]-I’m not familiar w/this name. It’s not my style, but I love the [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] part.

[name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Marigold[/name_f]-[name_f]Lyra[/name_f] is gorgeous. I like [name_f]Marigold[/name_f] too, but this combo is a bit ‘r’ heavy. Maybe [name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Magnolia[/name_f]?

[name_f]Libby[/name_f] [name_u]June[/name_u]-This is cute, but [name_f]Libby[/name_f] is better as a nn for [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] in my opinion.

[name_f]Celia[/name_f] [name_u]Haven[/name_u]-I really like [name_f]Celia[/name_f]. It’s smart & feminine, but not overly fussy. [name_u]Haven[/name_u] is not my style, but this flow is fine.

[name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] [name_f]Fern[/name_f]-I don’t care for [name_f]Rebecca[/name_f], but it’s sort of a personal association thing. I appreciate the classic Biblical feel of it, & I love [name_f]Fern[/name_f]!

[name_f]Odette[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]-Not my style, but kind of cool & different.

[name_f]Ruth[/name_f] [name_f]Alessandra[/name_f]-Aw, I love [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]. It has just the right combination of sophisticated & kind. I suppose this combo is okay. Not two names I would pair together, but it’s not bad. I’d stick [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] w/something more in the same realm like [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] or [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f].

[name_f]Hope[/name_f] this helps. :slight_smile:

[name_f]Stella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] - I like this! [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] is so distinguished and elegant. I have to admit I would prefer [name_f]Estella[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] or [name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f], [name_f]Stella[/name_f] has always seemed a bit incomplete to me.

[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - I love [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f]! Literary, familiar and has a lovely meaning. I’m not that big on [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f], but the flow is nice.

[name_u]Sterling[/name_u] [name_u]Monroe[/name_u] - [name_u]Sterling[/name_u] has always seemed like a horse name to me… sorry! [name_u]Monroe[/name_u] is unusual and interesting.

[name_m]Bowie[/name_m] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] - I definitely see this as a tribute to [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Bowie[/name_m], so if it isn’t, I might suggest using another first name. If it’s supposed to be (if he made a large impact on who you are) I think it’s interesting and unique. I like how you added a classic name to balance it out.

[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] - [name_f]Harriet[/name_f] isn’t my style, I find it quite dated. [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] is lovely and light.

Wrenly [name_f]Rose[/name_f] - I really like this! The ‘ly’ in Wrenly breaks up that R sound, but the names are still tied together by the sound.

[name_f]Erica[/name_f] [name_f]Noelle[/name_f] - [name_f]Erica[/name_f] seems a little plain to me, but [name_f]Noelle[/name_f] is lovely, reminds me of snow.

[name_f]Vienna[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f] - I really like [name_f]Vienna[/name_f]! Very refreshing, interesting and feminine. I have bad associations with [name_f]Grace[/name_f].

Danicia [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] - I didn’t know Danicia was a name, and I don’t think I’m a fan. [name_f]Maeve[/name_f] is great, I like the femininity.

[name_f]Lyra[/name_f] [name_f]Marigold[/name_f] - Great combo! Both light, sweet, intriguing names.

[name_f]Libby[/name_f] [name_u]June[/name_u] - [name_f]Libby[/name_f] seems like a nickname to me, but [name_u]June[/name_u] in the middle spot is great.

[name_f]Celia[/name_f] [name_u]Haven[/name_u] - I like this! [name_f]Celia[/name_f] is quite elegant and classic, while [name_u]Haven[/name_u] is fresher and adds a more modern touch.

[name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] [name_f]Fern[/name_f] - [name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] seems overdone to me, but [name_f]Fern[/name_f] is fantastic.

[name_f]Odette[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] - Great combo! Balance of harsher sounds and softer ones.

[name_f]Ruth[/name_f] [name_f]Alessandra[/name_f] - [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] seems vintage to me, not old-fashioned, so I think that even though it’s not my style, it’s usable. [name_f]Alessandra[/name_f] is alright, but nothing about it stands out to me.