Most of you probably now my “rate the previous signature” thread and have posted once or twice, however at the moment we tend to be the same people rating the same signatures over and over again (or not at all but only ranking them) and I’d love to get some new (or ones I haven’t heard in a while) opinions on my signature.
So if you have the time, I’d love for you to comment either on all names or just on the combinations 
I really do like them. In some ways we have similar tastes, I err more towards less common though. [name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] though. Stunning. <3 also love Edmund.
[name_f]Ada[/name_f]: I like it! It’s a nice alternative to the uber-popular [name_f]Ava[/name_f].
[name_f]Alice[/name_f]: I’ve never been able to get into this name for myself, but I like it on other people’s children.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f]: This is pretty. The “floor” sound is a little too pronounced for me to love it, but it’s nice.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f]: I [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]! Unfortunately for me, I love [name_m]John[/name_m] and [name_u]James[/name_u] more, which makes it unusable as a first name, but I love it!
[name_f]Rose[/name_f]: I really like [name_f]Rose[/name_f], and it exudes great imagery of the flower.
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: I have really fell in love with this name recently. It’s super handsome.
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m]: I love the [name_f]Narnia[/name_f] connection! A really strong name.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m]: This name is adorable on a little boy, yet I can also picture it on a grown man. Great choice!
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: I go back and forth on this name. I prefer [name_m]Hugh[/name_m] in general because it reduces the association with the word “huge”.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]: I have been admiring this combo from afar for a long time. [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] is such an underused gem, and [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] really grounds it.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: This combo is close to perfection. It just exudes a handsome, chivalrous man.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: I naturally prefer [name_m]Henry[/name_m] to [name_m]Hugo[/name_m], but this combo flows well.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f]: I really like this combo! It’s really well balanced with the whimsy of [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] and the down-to-earth nature of [name_f]Mary[/name_f].
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: This combo is heavy on very strong sounds (‘d’ and ‘g’) which makes it feel a little weighed down.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f]: YES! I love this combo. Perfection in every way.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]: I really like how [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] lightens the name and makes it feel more playful. Well-balanced.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]: I really like [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f]. [name_f]Violet[/name_f] isn’t really my cup of tea, but the combo flows well.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]: I’m partial to [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] (see my signature), so I really love this combo. Very elegant with [name_f]Flora[/name_f].
[name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m]: A little heavy on the‘d’ sounds, but I really love seeing both [name_m]Edgar[/name_m] and [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] getting some love.
[name_f]Matilda[/name_f]: This name has definitely grown on me. I picture a really spunky little girl with this name.
[name_f]Violet[/name_f]: I’ve never been able to like this name (too close to ‘violent’), but I can see the appeal. I would love to meet a little [name_f]Violet[/name_f].
You have fabulous taste! All of your names go really well together. They strike me as a 1920s English family living in the countryside, which is great imagery. I really enjoyed rating this signature”
[name_f]Ada[/name_f], love it! I have it on my signature as well.
I don’t know if I should consider it for #2
[name_f]Alice[/name_f], not a name I like but it is a nice name.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f], I never had good relationship with f names but [name_f]Flora[/name_f] is cute
[name_f]Jane[/name_f], too basic? I guess
[name_f]Rose[/name_f], timeless classic~ I don’t like literal Turkish translation Gül but real Turkic word Gonca is a GP of me
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m], love it but I slightly prefer [name_m]Artur[/name_m] as a spelling
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m], I love it but it has a feel of darkness? Like it looks like a dark name? I don’t know why
[name_m]Henry[/name_m], another classic I think you prefer assic names… Sigh we are so different
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m], is a no for me
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] 10/10 A+ love this. So many possible nicknames too
Should I post something similar to that ^^
Thank You! I have a long list of vintage names (not all that I love, more as a source for suggestions, etc.) and one day, while working on other combos, those two just found their way into my mind and I had to write the combo down as I loved it immediately.
If only I loved each name individually as much as I love the combo, then it would for sure be in my Top 3, but at his point, I much prefer Edmund to Edgar and Leopold is a name that I’ve always admired from afar but that doesn’t feel right on my own list; so Edgar Leopold is very much a GP 
I have done your signature before but it was slightly different then… and I don’t like to give personal opinion except when one directly pleads, as you have @opheliaflora. You are right about the same old…maybe a different format because I know I don’t like to say I ‘like’ or ‘don’t and am also sensitive myself; also bluntly honest if asked.!!So here goes.
I would be very happy if I was told I ‘had’ to name my (future) children [name_f]Rose[/name_f] and [name_m]Edmund[/name_m]. 10/10
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] & [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] - Generally I like most English classics but these are forever gorgeous in
any company. I won’t name my children [name_f]Rose[/name_f] or [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] because I have DH to
consider and his taste is more ‘out there’ :-!
[name_f]Ada[/name_f] – I like the name on a few people. They are all lovely people, it sounds pure yet I am
not swooning about the sound appeal - would only rate it … 8/10
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] - I think I disliked this name when I first started ‘reading’ Nameberry but from your
signature and compared to some other names going around, I am getting fonder of
it all the time. It’s simple and elegant. 9/10
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] – I am very ambivalent about. I love the sound, smell, sight, and imagery but I would
not use it myself- Perhaps it is the Aussie margarine- or a forgotten memory or 9/10
association.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - Absolutely adore this name. I would have chosen it for myself, for me I mean.”
I am not a [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. [name_f]Jane[/name_f] in a little black dress (be it purple or orange) who is a literary buff. 10/10
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m] – No I cannot like this. [name_m]Art[/name_m]-yes, but not [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] even though it’s a grandparents first name. 5/10
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] – I have [name_m]Henry[/name_m] very close to [name_m]Edmund[/name_m]. I also love [name_m]Harry[/name_m] as an alternate name, though
I know not everyone does. It’s a lovely combination of sounds and somehow with the
preceding ‘r’ manages to avoid being a ‘ee’ name despite the ‘y’ ending. [name_m]Henri[/name_m] also. 10/10
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] - Yes I am a fan of this. It manages to sound spunky and classic. It’s handsome. 9/10
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] & [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f] are my combo picks 10/10 - I am not fond
of either [name_f]Violet[/name_f] or [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] right now, but after you have worked with them I will no doubt
change my opinion - loving your input!
[name_f]Ada[/name_f]: I like it!
[name_f]Alice[/name_f]: I love the story of [name_f]Alice[/name_f] In Wonderland. I have never relly been to into it to consider using it. I would however love to meet an [name_f]Alice[/name_f]!
[name_f]Flora[/name_f]: Apart from the ‘floor’ sound I think this name is beautiful, it brings gorgeous imagery to mind
[name_f]Jane[/name_f]: I am on the fence on the name. Sometimes I think it is enough and other days I feel it is plain. Maybe with a long and kind of grande middle name?
[name_f]Rose[/name_f]: [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] the name and of course the gorgeous imagery of the flower.
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: This name grows on me and then I get negative feedback from people! I love it!
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m]: I have [name_f]Narnia[/name_f] associations with this. I prefer [name_m]Eduardo[/name_m] for a [name_m]Ed[/name_m]- name
[name_m]Henry[/name_m]: I [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] this name! I love that I can picture it on any age group and that it seems strong yet light.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: I love this name. It has an amazing meaning and I can picture it on every age group. I have known 1 in real life.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]: I love this, [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is abit plain but when paired with [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] it becomes less plain. I love [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] it seems to complete the name
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: Handsome and classic. I am not a huge fan of [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] but it fits well in this combo.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: Same as above but [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] brings more of an exotic-ish/rare twist.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f]: I am not a huge fan of the Initials due to abbreviations of companies and events in Australia other than that it is a nice combo. I love [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] and I personally would love to see that as the FN.
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: Very strong sounds in each of these names with the 'd’s and the ‘g’ but I do like the look of it.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f]: This is what I was meaning of making [name_f]Jane[/name_f] look less plain. I do find [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] to be teetering on the edge of plain but [name_f]Flora[/name_f] seems to make it jump out of that plainness
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]: love heart eyes emoji This is perfection. This is beautiful. Romantic-y with out being [name_m]OTT[/name_m] and the use of [name_f]Edith[/name_f] <3 <3 <3 No more words.
Jane Matilda Violet: I am not a fan of Violet. I love Matilda, and Jane is pretty. Altogether it is okay, meh but interesting.
Flora Elisabeth Jane: Oh… This… Is gorgeous! I like the ending with one syllable, I love the name…
Edgar Leopold: I find it abit ‘d’ heavy but I love Leopold and would be using it instead of Leo but my SO dislikes it.
Matilda: I love Matilda. It is a gorgeous name with history and abundant with awesome NNs
Violet: Ever since my partner sang a ‘song’ I find it too close to ‘violent’. Once upon a time it was my number 4 choice until I consulted the Mister on names.
I’ve said how much I love your names before, but never spoke about the individual names before so:
[name_f]Ada[/name_f] - I wouldn’t use this myself but I think this is a lovely, classic name.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] - I love this name! So simple but gorgeous at the same time.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] - I think this is lovely, but I can’t help thinking of the butter brand of the same name. I think I prefer [name_f]Florence[/name_f] to [name_f]Flora[/name_f], mostly because of this.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - Again, simple and gorgeous. That this is the name of my favourite author gives it extra points.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] - My all-time favourite name. I have loved this since I was little and I think it is beautiful, simple and elegant.
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - [name_u]Love[/name_u] this.
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] - This is starting to creep up on me. I’ve always loved [name_m]Edward[/name_m], but I think [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] is threatening to overtake. I think its lovely.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] - My favourite boys name - I love it! Classic, simple and strong.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] - Another name that I used to like but not overly, but that is now one of my favourites. I love this as an mn.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] - Without a doubt, one of the prettiest, most perfect combos I’ve seen on NB. Classic and gorgeous. I love the use of [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] too.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - Absolutely gorgeous, I love it.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - [name_m]Henry[/name_m] is my favourite boys name but I love this combo with [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] too.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f] - [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] isn’t one of my favourite names but I like it here. [name_f]Alice[/name_f] and [name_f]Mary[/name_f] are lovely and all three names go together well.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f] - [name_f]Lovely[/name_f]! I prefer the [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] spelling but I think that here, the [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] gives a beautiful, soft and girly feel and look to the combo.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f] - I love this. [name_f]Lovely[/name_f] flow and the use of [name_f]Edith[/name_f] makes me like it even more.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] - I like this better than the previous [name_f]Jane[/name_f] combo but that may just be because I love [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. I think [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] or [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] are nice mixes of these two combos.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - Very pretty.
[name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] - I love this! Classic, strong and handsome. I love the repeating d sound too - I think it makes it sound strong rather than harsh.
[name_f]Matilda[/name_f] - One of my favourites. One of my GP’s is [name_f]Matilde[/name_f] too.
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] - Gorgeous, classic name.
I completely adore your style!
[name_f]Ada[/name_f] - Sweet and elegant, [name_f]Ada[/name_f] feels very belle époque and at the same time, very current.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] - A stylish classic. [name_f]Alice[/name_f] sounds very dainty and lacy to me, but it still has sass.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] - I love [name_f]Flora[/name_f]. It is just so evocative of a country garden, delicate and fashionable but sincere and natural.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is smart and urban and clever, at the same time as being simple. I slightly prefer [name_u]Joan[/name_u], but [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is a wonderful choice.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] - [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is beautiful. However popular [name_f]Rose[/name_f] gets, it will always feel quaint in a bucolic and womanly way.
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - I love the connection to [name_m]King[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] and his Knights. This is a very old name, and very trendy at the moment.
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] - I can’t overstate how much I love [name_m]Edmund[/name_m]. One of the most English names, it has proved its power to stand the test of time. It has so many fantastic namesakes. It just oozes quite strength and intellect.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] - Very masculine and regal. I’m not personally a [name_m]Henry[/name_m] enthusiast, but I appreciate how solid and classic it is.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] - Like [name_m]Arthur[/name_m], this is very trendy at the moment. It is very dapper Edwardian, and I love the meaning.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] - Combined with [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], I find that [name_f]Rose[/name_f] feels a bit overdone-ruffled-Victorian.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - Classic and beautiful, I love [name_m]Frederick[/name_m].
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - I think putting [name_m]Hugo[/name_m], [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] and [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] together in one person’s name is making it turn-of-the-century to the point of affectation.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f] - The three names compliment each other beautifully. [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] strengthens [name_f]Alice[/name_f]'s sparkle, and [name_f]Mary[/name_f] brings them down to earth with her sweet simpleness and purity.
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] - I am not keen on [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] and [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] together. While [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] can be a lovely name, paired with [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] the combination loses some sincerity.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f] - I would prefer [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f], as [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] feels a bit too continental with the very British [name_f]Jane[/name_f]. [name_f]Flora[/name_f] has a very different flavour
from [name_f]Jane[/name_f] to me, but I still find that this works.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f] - [name_f]Flora[/name_f] is pure sweetness, [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] is ladylike elegance, and [name_f]Edith[/name_f] is homespun and girlish. [name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f] gives a bit of juxtaposition of feels to me, and I find that they would make better sister names than middle names for each other.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] - [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] compliments [name_f]Jane[/name_f]'s spunkiness, but [name_f]Violet[/name_f] makes it more primping and coquettish.
[name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] - A name that makes a statement. Very aristocratic.
Thank you! So many of the names in your signature are wonderful, too and I very much take the 1920s English family as a compliment as I do love all things vintage (well, not their rights and laws but names, clothes, furniture, etc. ;))!
First off, I enjoy most vintage names, too, so, naturally, I really like your style
[name_f]Ada[/name_f]: it’s so simple yet very beautiful, also has a special meaning to me since my brother’s name is [name_m]Adam[/name_m] and it is usable in many languages
[name_f]Alice[/name_f]: there has been a time when I’ve totally loved [name_f]Alice[/name_f] and I still find it charming but now I prefer [name_f]Ada[/name_f]
[name_f]Flora[/name_f]: beautiful, I can imagine it perfectly well on a grown woman and I know a most wonderful little girl with this name which suits her perfectly, multicultural
[name_f]Jane[/name_f]: definitely timeless and in my opinion very sophisticated, it’s never been one of my favourites but is always an option, I love [name_m]John[/name_m] and [name_m]Jack[/name_m]
[name_f]Rose[/name_f]: this on the other hand is a longtime favourite of mine and has deserved to be used much more often in the top spot rather than the middle
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: I can’t really get myself to love this name but it totally fits in with all your other names and who knows maybe I’ll grow fond of it after all
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m]: for short time one of my absolute favs, now has slided a little downwards partially due to some negative reactions of family members (who are german which is why I think this might be different with an english fam), but I still do love it
[name_m]Henry[/name_m]: kinda has always been on my list, never made it quite to the top, but is like [name_f]Jane[/name_f] always an option especially due to its usability in several languages
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: also multicultural, at the moment I like it somewhat more than [name_m]Henry[/name_m], those beautiful vowels and literary ties
[name_f]Matilda[/name_f]: yeah well I do like this but don’t really love it at the moment but maybe that’ll come back
[name_f]Violet[/name_f]: lately I’ve grown to really be into this one, it has a lot of romantic yet sophisticated appeal
I’m just gonna write down my favourites of your combos
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], although I’m really not a fan of [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] but I guess it maybe has some special significance to you
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
hope that helped a little
Your names are all wonderful. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] and [name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] are exceptional.
[name_f]Ada[/name_f] - First of all, do you pronounce it AY-dah or [name_m]AH[/name_m]-dah? I love the latter one and I think it’s sweet and short. I imagine a child with rosy cheeks, curls, quiet but with attitude. The [name_f]Ada[/name_f] Lovelace association definitely doesn’t hurt either.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] - I used to really dislike this, but I’ve started to warm up to it lately. I like that it doesn’t end in an -a, that it’s simple but feminine and a name with lots of history and cool associations (cough [name_f]Alice[/name_f] in Wonderland cough).
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] - Another one I’m starting to warm up to. I feel that it’s warm and cozy; it makes me think of tea in old-fashioned tea cups and gardens with bounds of flowers (hehe).
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - Short and sweet with a lot of sass. I feel it lacks a bit compared to the other names.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] - I love [name_f]Rose[/name_f] and feel that she’s so underrated as a first name.
I’ll come back and rate the rest later
[name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] is phenomenal! [name_m]Edgar[/name_m] is by far my fave ed name, and [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] is so handsome!
[name_f]Rose[/name_f]: Gorgeous as a first name. Suit any stage of life, sweet and strong all together.
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m]: love it with [name_f]Rose[/name_f], but I personally prefer [name_m]Edgar[/name_m]. I don’t like the mund ending on names for some reason.
[name_f]Ada[/name_f]: I prefer the [name_m]AH[/name_m]-duh pronunciation. It’s my mother’s nickname, a name I have also considered.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f]: I have never managed to see the appeal of [name_f]Flor[/name_f] names, though [name_f]Florence[/name_f] is growing on me. I associate [name_f]Flora[/name_f] with a nasty TV character, so Iam not a fan of it.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f]: Absolutely gorgeous! One of my favorites. [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is just awesome.
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: I personally prefer [name_m]Arturo[/name_m], but [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] is sweet, particularly inthe mmiddle spot.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m]: so very handsome and classy! I love [name_m]Henry[/name_m].
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: I prefer [name_m]Henry[/name_m], but [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] is still very handsome, just not for me.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]: I [name_f]Adore[/name_f] the [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] part, but [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] doesn’t add anything to me.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] vs [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] flows better imo. Something on the endings of [name_m]Henry[/name_m] and [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] puts me off.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f]: so lovely!
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: doesn’t flow good imo. [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] is better. Still, [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] isn’t terrible.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f] vs [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]: I love [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] and. [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] but [name_f]Flora[/name_f] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f] don’t add anything imo. If I had to choose, then [name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f].
[name_f]Matilda[/name_f]: I like it, though more as a middle name.
[name_f]Violet[/name_f]: I want to like it, buy still haven’t got there. It doesn’t have the same classy feel as your others imo.
Overall, I find your names very beautiful!
Sure, why not?! I post something like this about once a year just to get a few different opinions; they don’t change my own (usually) but they’re interesting to read and usually a few things worth considering come up, which I then think about and maybe try to fix or change.
Single names:
[name_f]Ada[/name_f] ~ I like this well enough, it’s sweet but doesn’t do anything special for me. 7/10
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] ~ I like [name_f]Alice[/name_f]. I have a personal association that ruins this name for me, however, I’d still like to see this on a child so that association could change! 7/10
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] ~ [name_u]Love[/name_u], love, love. So sweet had this on my favorites list for awhile! 10/10
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] ~ Not really a fan of [name_f]Jane[/name_f]. NMS. Nothing wrong with it though. 5/10
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] ~ [name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]! Very refreshing in the first name spot. 9/10
[name_f]Matilda[/name_f] ~ [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] is okay. [name_m]Don[/name_m]'t love it or hate it. I love to meet a [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] just not use it myself. 7/10
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] ~ [name_f]Violet[/name_f] is pretty. [name_m]Just[/name_m] very overused but that shouldn’t really matter if you love it. I have just heard it so many times it doesn’t excite me anymore. 8/10
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m] ~ [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] is so handsome and magical! [name_u]Love[/name_u] it. 9/10
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] ~ One of my absolute favorites right now, so handsome! 10/10
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] ~ See [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. 8/10
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] ~ I like [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] a lot! Very handsome. 9/10
Combos:
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] ~ Absolutely gorgeous. My favorite combination of yours. Usually not a huge fan of [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] but I like it here. 10/10
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] ~ I like this a lot but I prefer [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] to [name_m]Henry[/name_m]. 8/10
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] ~ Very handsome !! 10/10
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f] ~ This is nice. [name_m]Just[/name_m] doesn’t do much for me. 7/10
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] ~ [name_u]Love[/name_u] it! 9/10
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f] ~ This is pretty. [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f] livens [name_f]Jane[/name_f] up. 8/10
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f] ~ Very pretty! 8/10
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] ~ This is just ok to me not a huge fan of each individual names. 6/10
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] ~ Like this a lot! 8/10
[name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] ~ I like this a lot, I prefer [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] to [name_m]Edgar[/name_m] though. 8/10
Sometimes more people post, sometimes less, it has been like that since I created that thread and I’m always very appreciative of anyone who takes the time to rate my signature, if the same person rates it over and over and over again (or at one point doesn’t anymore and just ranks it for the 5th time) it doesn’t help me much.
I’d also be completely fine if somebody told me I had to name my kids [name_f]Rose[/name_f] & [name_m]Edmund[/name_m], no complaints at all (well, unless I had to name two girls those names).
[name_f]Ada[/name_f] - I’m not a massive fan, nice enough but feels incomplete
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] - lovely
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] - feels dowdy and old and clumpy
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - it has a soft elegence to it which I like
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] - it is okay, nothing to write home about but nice. I prefer [name_f]Rose[/name_f] to many of the long versions
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] - It is okay, nothing to really make it bad but equally nothing to make it great
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f] - I like [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] a lot the [name_f]Mary[/name_f] feels clumpy at the end
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f] - Like the s in [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f]
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f] - [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edit[/name_f] is nice the [name_f]Flora[/name_f] is just too clumpy
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] - nice
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] - despite my dislike of [name_f]Flora[/name_f] it does go
[name_f]Matilda[/name_f] - love it
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] - I don’t see the appeal.
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - lovely
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] - love it, much better than [name_m]Edward[/name_m]
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] - delightful
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] - nope,far too posh and stuckup feel, much prefer [name_m]Hugh[/name_m]
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - delightful, all of it
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m] - my dislike of [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] ruins it
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] - it doesn’t quite feel right
[name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] - I like [name_m]Leopold[/name_m], not [name_m]Edgar[/name_m]
[name_f]Ada[/name_f]: [name_f]Lovely[/name_f] name!
[name_f]Alice[/name_f]: I love how it’s vintage but still timeless (it’s my middle name so I may be biased though).
[name_f]Flora[/name_f]: I don’t personally love [name_f]Flora[/name_f], but it fits very well with your other names.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f]: My favourite name of the moment! I feel like it may be misunderstood by the general public (plain-[name_f]Jane[/name_f] etc), but a revival is definitely coming.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f]: Gorgeous.
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: My favourite boys name, but I feel that it might start to get overly-popular where I am (UK).
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m]: This has really grown on me, to the point where it’s becoming a favourite.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m]: I like [name_m]Henry[/name_m], though it is very overused in my area.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] has never really grown on me, though I can see the appeal. I just don’t like the [name_m]Hugh[/name_m]- sound.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]: I’m not a big [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] fan - for me, [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] would be perfection!
[name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: Very handsome.
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Arthur[/name_m]: I prefer the [name_m]Henry[/name_m] combo.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f]: Stunning, though I would prefer just [name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] (I do like [name_f]Mary[/name_f], I just tend to prefer one mn).
[name_m]Edmund[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]: I really like how [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] brings life to the more serious [name_m]Edmund[/name_m], but I find that the combo doesn’t really run off the tongue. It’s still very nice though.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f]: In this case I really like the addition of [name_f]Flora[/name_f], as the name is slightly plain without it.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]: Not my favourite.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] [name_f]Matilda[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]: 3 of my favourite names! [name_u]Love[/name_u] the flow of this.
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]: I don’t like how the ‘a’ of [name_f]Flora[/name_f] runs into the ‘E’ of [name_f]Elisabeth[/name_f].
[name_m]Edgar[/name_m] [name_m]Leopold[/name_m]: Not really my style.
As I have two middle names, that has always been the norm for me, I suppose, and otherwise I’d miss out on using all those lovely names as I don’t plan on having 10 children 
(I absolutely get where you’re coming from, though, as I personally think that more than three middle names don’t flow well or just seem a bit over-the-top; someone else might feel different as they do have four.)