- Hate and/or would never use
- Dislike and/or would most likely not use
- Neither dislike or like -feel neutral about or like on another person’s child but wouldn’t use myself
- Like and /or might use myself
- Really love and/or would probably use myself
The names:
[name]Adelaine[/name]-2. [name]Just[/name] stick with [name]Adelaide[/name]. Otherwise, it sounds really made up.
[name]Amalee[/name]-2. I like the original spelling of [name]Amelie[/name]. This spelling is too kreeatifv for me.
[name]Amethyst[/name]-3. I think the jewel names trend is a pretty safe one to follow. I, myself, would choose [name]Ruby[/name] from this catergory; I think it looks extremely sophisticated.
[name]Amity[/name]-2. Personal aquaintance, so I’m a little biased. Perhaps you might like Honoura “[name]Nora[/name]” better, or [name]Mercy[/name]?
[name]Braelynn[/name]-1. I have a rule for myself against almost every “-lynn” name. This is no exception. Have you consider [name]Bay[/name], maybe? I think it’s much better than [name]Bray[/name], which makes donkeys come to mind.
[name]Caroline[/name]-4 1/2. Ooh! Very pretty. [name]Love[/name] the nn [name]Calla[/name] for this. This name definitely gets extra cred!
[name]Clemence[/name] nn [name]Cleo[/name]-3 3/4. This name is very cute. My tastes lie more with [name]Clementine[/name] nn [name]Clemmie[/name], but this is another good one.
[name]Divinity[/name]-1 1/2. See [name]Amity[/name] (except I’ve never known a [name]Divinity[/name]).
[name]Epiphany[/name] nn [name]Ephie[/name]-2 1/3. Not this worst, but I’d beware of using it.
[name]Esmae[/name]-2. As [name]Esme[/name] (with that little dash above the second E) it would be atleast a solid 3. But unless the name is simply just [name]Mae[/name], please don’t put a “-mae” in it.
[name]Effie[/name]-3. I’d rather this be a nn for something. Like, Efima.
[name]Enid[/name]-2. Much too boring for me. Consider [name]Edith[/name].
[name]Enya[/name]-2 1/3. Not great but not “hide-your-face” awful.
[name]Eulalie[/name] nn Lalie-4 1/3. Great one! I SO want this to be brought back! Maybe [name]Eulalie[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] (or better yet, [name]Carolina[/name], pronounced like the state, not as [name]Leena[/name]).
[name]Emmeline[/name] nn [name]Emme[/name]-5. Gorgeous name!! Please choose this one, not [name]Braelynn[/name]!!!
[name]Hazel[/name]-4 1/2. And I thought we had nothing in common with names. [name]Love[/name] it! [name]Emmeline[/name] (I personally prefer EmmeLEEN vs. [name]EmmeLINE[/name] or EmmeLYNN) [name]Hazel[/name] would be another great combo.
[name]Idelle[/name]-3. [name]How[/name] about you mix your [name]Adelaine[/name] and [name]Idelle[/name] to=[name]Adella[/name]!
[name]Jubilee[/name]-1. No means for a celebration (pun intended).
[name]Laura[/name]-1. Boooor-ing!
[name]Laurel[/name] nn [name]Laura[/name]-3. This is a better alternative; ust don’t use the nn! For a different nn, think about [name]Rella[/name] or [name]Aura[/name].
Lillyanna-2. With the spelling as [name]Liliana[/name] (nn [name]Lila[/name]), I’d move this up to atleast 3 or 4. It’s getting to close to [name]Braelynn[/name]!!!
[name]Maeve[/name]-4 1/4. Beautiful. I love it. [name]Maeve[/name] [name]Liliana[/name] would be great. Could [name]Maeve[/name] be a nn to [name]Mabel[/name]? That would be too cool. [name]Maeva[/name] is also catchy.
Maevis-1 1/4. Still an old granny.
[name]Myrtice[/name]-1. Really? Try [name]Myrtle[/name].
[name]Maegan[/name]-1. Ahhhh!!! [name]Braelynn[/name] in M form!!!
[name]Miranda[/name]-1 1/3. If only I haven’t heard of a million [name]Miranda[/name]'s. I love that it’s [name]Shakespeare[/name], but try [name]Perdita[/name], [name]Beatrice[/name], [name]Hero[/name], [name]Cordelia[/name], [name]Cressida[/name], [name]Hermia[/name], [name]Juliet[/name], [name]Lucetta[/name], [name]Nerissa[/name], [name]Ophelia[/name], [name]Rosaline[/name], or [name]Viola[/name]. This also works for anyone in love with the name [name]Olivia[/name].
[name]Naoma[/name]-1. [name]Naomi[/name] is a step up, and [name]Noemi[/name] is pretty.
[name]Oakley[/name]-3. Possibly. Not sure.
[name]Paloma[/name]-3. I like the meaning. I know an [name]Angela[/name] [name]Paloma[/name] that goes by Palo.
[name]Peridot[/name]-2. Not so crazy about it.
[name]Rose[/name]-2 1/2. [name]How[/name] about as a nn for [name]Rosaline[/name] or [name]Rosalba[/name]?
[name]Roisin[/name] (pronounced [name]Ro[/name]-sheen)-3/ (Continued from sentence above) …or this?
Reverie-1 2/3. I prefer the surname alternative: Revere. And who’s a better namesake than the guy who is notorious for yelling, “The British are coming! The British are coming!”
[name]Remember[/name]-3. A cool, Puritan-esque name.
[name]Tacey[/name]-1 1/2. I don’t know if I’m accurate, but this seems pretty 80’s to me. No.
[name]Tansy[/name]-4 1/2. Cute!! [name]Love[/name] as a nn for [name]Anastasia[/name] (with either a sister [name]Antoinette[/name] “[name]Netta[/name]” or Jospehine “[name]Posey[/name]”).
[name]Victory[/name]-2. You know those Uncool-Cooler-Coolest lists? [name]Victoria[/name] would be Uncool, [name]Victory[/name] would be Cooler, and [name]Victoire[/name] or [name]Vittoria[/name] would be coolest.
[name]Willow[/name]-2. I’m like [name]Willa[/name] for [name]Wilhelmina[/name] better. Or [name]Winter[/name] nn [name]Winnie[/name], for a semi-hippie sound.
[name]Wisdom[/name]-1 1/4. A heavy weight to bear, ya think? For word names, I prefer [name]Fable[/name] or [name]Story[/name].