I think I might have my [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] combination, but I’m not sure what order to have the double middles in.
Which flows better: [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m] or [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m] [name_u]Rhys[/name_u]?
Any thoughts on the combo?
Well, in the title, I was really swooning over [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m]! Which is a huge feat for me, since I’m not even a [name_m]Malachi[/name_m] fan. I think I like [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m] [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] better, but, for some reason, though I really like [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] and [name_m]Malachi[/name_m] together, I’m not feeling [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m]/[name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m] [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] as much. I’m not sure why. As it sits with me, though, I like [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_m]Malachi[/name_m] [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] more and more. I think I was just disappointed that [name_u]Rhys[/name_u] wasn’t the first name. I had forgotten you were looking for [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] MNs.