[name]Just[/name] pondering here… (for those of you who don’t know, I have an as-yet un-named baby girl.) Taking a break from stressing about her name to think about our boy name.
Had DD been a boy, she would have been [name]Asher[/name] [name]Vale[/name], or possibly [name]Lucien[/name] [name]Vale[/name]. ([name]Vale[/name] is a family name, important to continue)
Now that I’m thinking of using [name]Aster[/name] for DD, I’m thinking of what it will mean to give up [name]Asher[/name] should we have another boy. (DS#1 is [name]Gabriel[/name]). [name]Lucien[/name], although I love it, rhymes with our last name, so probably would not actually be picked for theoretic boy #2. Plus, I’m not keen on [name]Luke[/name], although [name]Luca[/name] is great.
Which brings me to our third string boy name- [name]Sacha[/name].
Some people recoiled in horror at the thought of [name]Sacha[/name] for a boy, so I wanted to see what the nameberry population thinks of it.
Is it useable if we give up [name]Asher[/name]? (we are not French, if it makes a difference) I [name]DO[/name] NOT [name]EVER[/name] want to go through naming again! (I’ve already agreed that theoretic DD #2 can be [name]Thea[/name], no discussion needed. I’d get used to it for a theoretic baby, it just doesn’t work for the already born one.)
Also, how’s [name]Gabriel[/name], [name]Aster[/name] and [name]Sacha[/name] for a sibset?