[name_f]Do[/name_f] you find [name_f]Sarah[/name_f] to still be a meaningful classic or a bland name that doesn’t really have a flair?
If it is bland, is it because it is overused, or some other reason?
Thanks for your opinion!
[name_f]Do[/name_f] you find [name_f]Sarah[/name_f] to still be a meaningful classic or a bland name that doesn’t really have a flair?
If it is bland, is it because it is overused, or some other reason?
Thanks for your opinion!
Classic. When I was growing up, the name did almost enrage me with how boring it was since it was synonymous with suburban living, but I now view it as a fierce and romantic classic that just was too oversaturated at one point.
Classic. I will always love [name_f]Sarah[/name_f].
What a wonderful way to put it! I feel the exact same way
I love [name_f]Sarah[/name_f] ! It’s a beautiful classic and I am always happy to see or hear it!
Sarah is a bit boring for me, but it is definitely a classic too.
It’s definitely classic. To me, personally, right now, it does feel a bit stale. I just grew up with so many Sarahs. However, I think it will always very much be classic even if it was a little overused for a while. Give me a few years and I’ll love it like I love many other down-trending classics!
Classic and lovely.
I think [name_f]Sara[/name_f] gives that name a new freshness. [name_f]Sarah[/name_f] is still usable though, but feels more dated.
I think it’s a classic. And with it meaning princess it’s so sweet! Maybe in grade school I would’ve said it was a cool girl name (not in a bad way) and now I just really like it.
I think it’s classic and refreshing! I would love to meet a little [name_f]Sarah[/name_f].
Thank you for defending my name lol
I know a few Sarahs but don’t get bored of it at all - definitely a classic!
I really, really love [name_f]Sarah[/name_f]. It’s strong and substantial but also very feminine and elegant.
I agree that it’s a classic. I also think it’s a great name to double-barrel.
What does double-barrel mean?
Attach it to another name and call her by both.
“[name_f]Sarah[/name_f] [name_f]Lorelei[/name_f]”
“[name_f]Sarah[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]”
“[name_f]Sarah[/name_f] [name_f]Fiona[/name_f]”
“[name_f]Sarah[/name_f] [name_f]Mabel[/name_f]”
“[name_f]Sarah[/name_f] [name_u]Kaye[/name_u]”
Bland on an adult woman, a refreshing classic on a child.
It’s objectively a classic, though I have a strong negative association with it that make it hard for me to like the name— that’s just personal though! I don’t see a lot of young Sarah’s running around, but I think the name is timeless. I also really like Sarah/Sara-based “double names” like Sara-Kate, Sara-Jane, Sara-May.
Both classic and bland.