Second Question

See the results of this poll: Which Audrey Combo?

Respondents: 52 (This poll is closed)

  • Audrey Sofia Violet : 31 (60%)
  • Audrey Isobel Violet: 21 (40%)

Both flow well, but I prefer [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. As to why, it’s just that I prefer [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] to [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] as a name.

Flow-wise, I prefer [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] but imagery wise, [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] wins (though it does remind me quite a bit of Downton [name_u]Abbey[/name_u], [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] that is). I just think she’s a bit more sophisticated and mature.
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] feels like a modern child to me, [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] could be [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] Hepburns full name, it has that kind of style.

They are both beautiful. I personally adore [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] and [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] (and [name_f]Sophie[/name_f]), [name_f]Sophie[/name_f] and [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] more so than [name_f]Sofia[/name_f]. I slightly prefer the flow of [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f].

I prefer [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] and I actually think [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] is a more modern child whereas [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] could be [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] Hepburn’s full name or the name of a refined princess.

They both work well but I voted for the [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] combo because [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f] were the mother and mother-in-law in Downton [name_u]Abbey[/name_u] and that immediately made me think of them and their funny little relationship.

Thank you, everyone :slight_smile:

Yes, I have thought about Downton [name_u]Abbey[/name_u], and I do love the realitionship between [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. I’ve decided I don’t mind the connection. It’s not as obvious, I think, as [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f] or [name_f]Cora[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f]. Idk.

I love they way @opheliaflora commented about [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] being an [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] Hepburn style name. She’s one of my favorite actresses, so that’s a great compliment to the combo!:slight_smile:

Anyone else? Thoughts?

[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Isabel[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]

I was actually going to suggest [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Sofia[/name_f]/[name_f]Sophia[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] to you earlier !!

I think it flows beautifully, and it just feels natural, imo. [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] is also nice, but it feels a little more stiff in comparison - the flow isn’t as naturally occurring, I suppose?

I think [name_f]Sofia[/name_f] flows better with it, but I personally like [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] better. Either way, I think it’s a great option!

Thanks for the comments and votes so far, everyone:)

Still debating though…anyone else like to weigh in?