Okay, I have try to post this post before. But I forgot to login & it erased everything I had. So this is going to be more short & to the point.
I’m [name]Liz[/name] ([name]Elizabeth[/name]), my husband is named [name]Bob[/name] ([name]Robert[/name]), & we have 2 kids, [name]Daniel[/name] [name]Elijah[/name] ([name]Danny[/name]) & [name]Jane[/name] [name]Phoebe[/name] ([name]Janie[/name]). We are exapeding twins around [name]October[/name] & [name]November[/name]. These are the name that are at the top of our list:
Let me first just tell you how striking your childrens names are. [name]Daniel[/name] and [name]Jane[/name] are classic, refreshing, sweet and cute:) They are well and are both connected to the Bible [name]Jane[/name] being a form of [name]John[/name] [name]Love[/name] [name]Janie[/name] and [name]Dan[/name]. I hope I can be of some assistance to you.
Boys
[name]Thomas[/name]-My fav:)
[name]Henry[/name]-love
[name]Jeremiah[/name]-cute like [name]Jeremy[/name].
[name]Augustus[/name]-to much. [name]August[/name].
[name]Spencer[/name]-alright to trendy for [name]Daniel[/name] and [name]Jane[/name].
[name]Edmond[/name]-with a U:) [name]Edmund[/name]. Makes it feel like a name rather than a city
[name]Emmett[/name]-not a fan [name]Em[/name] names should go to girls this one obviously not but I just don’t like it to Twlight or whatever that vampire movie is.
[name]Fredrick[/name]-cute
[name]Malcolm[/name]-nah. [name]Mal[/name] feels really girly.
[name]Wilson[/name]-love but what about [name]William[/name] fits your kids better.
[name]Matthew[/name]-too common not a [name]Matt[/name] fan.
[name]Benjamin[/name]-love
[name]Brian[/name]-cute
[name]Andrew[/name]-love
[name]Lincoln[/name] -to modern, the presidents last name. I am not a fan sorry I think this brings surnames as fn’s way to far.
[name]Maximus[/name]-[name]Maxwell[/name] or just [name]Max[/name]?
[name]Garrett[/name]-not a fan I don’t think it ages well but I really love strong masculine, classic names for boys.
Girls
[name]Alice[/name]-Very pretty
[name]Sarah[/name]-pretty Biblical fits with [name]Daniel[/name] and [name]Jane[/name].
[name]Constance[/name]-[name]Connie[/name] on it’s own is just okay but I prefer it to [name]Constance[/name].
[name]Estella[/name]-I’m not a [name]Stella[/name] fan.
[name]Catharine[/name]-[name]Catherine[/name] spelling or [name]Katherine[/name] or [name]Kathryn[/name].
[name]Cecelia[/name]-[name]LOVE[/name]
[name]Marianne[/name]-cute ages well, different unique.
[name]Annette[/name]-cute but has a bad girl rep [name]IMO[/name]. [name]Love[/name] just [name]Anne[/name].
[name]Isabel[/name]-Like I said below belle feels childish and I think [name]Isabel[/name]/[name]Isabella[/name]/[name]Isabelle[/name] don’t age well. Very princessy doesn’t fit a grown woman.
[name]Annabelle[/name]-[name]Belle[/name] makes a name feel childish [name]IMO[/name]. [name]Anna[/name] would be stunning.
[name]Ginger[/name]-nah, to out there [name]ImO[/name].
[name]Viola[/name]-cute have you thought of just [name]Violet[/name]?
[name]Molly[/name]-[name]Love[/name] would love [name]Mary[/name] with your classic names though better.
[name]Rosetta[/name]-cute;) [name]Love[/name] just [name]Rose[/name] too. My Great Grandma’s Grandma was [name]Rosetta[/name] [name]Josephine[/name]!
[name]Gracelyn[/name]-to trendy [name]Grace[/name] is very pretty on its own.
[name]Esme[/name]-I’m personally not a fan because it reminds me of a hair care product and that vampire movie and I would just prefer [name]May[/name] or [name]Mae[/name]. Its strong, pretty and ages well.
[name]Genevieve[/name]-[name]Love[/name] classic cute, ages well cute nn’s [name]Evie[/name], [name]Eve[/name], [name]Gennie[/name]