What great names! In order of preference, my thoughts are:
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Eliza[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- I think [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] and [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] are stunning together. Both have strong literary pedigrees, both have a nicknamey vibe while being full names in their own right, and both are underused and refreshing. [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] strikes me as a very clever, playful kind of name.
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Ruby[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- [name_f]Ruby[/name_f] is very much like [name_f]Daisy[/name_f], but while [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] strikes me as gentle and full of sunshine, [name_f]Ruby[/name_f] is all sass and fire. I love the way they mirror each other while having very different energies.
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Mara[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- Here’s the thing [name_f][/name_f]- when I first saw [name_f]Mara[/name_f] I thought I would put it at the bottom. It was nice, but not as sparkly as the other names. But after I thought about it, that was exactly what I started to love about [name_f]Mara[/name_f]. It’s such an understated gem [name_f][/name_f]- classic and beautiful and versatile, but I hardly ever see it on people’s lists. [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] and [name_f]Mara[/name_f] feel approachable and joyful and down-to-earth in a really gorgeous way.
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Tess[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- Similar energy to [name_f]Eliza[/name_f], but [name_f]Tess[/name_f] feels a bit sharper and more understated. I see [name_f]Tess[/name_f] as more fashion-forward and trim. [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] and [name_f]Tess[/name_f] feel like a super-literary pair, very intelligent, but still fun.
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Nora[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] and [name_f]Nora[/name_f] feel very warm together. [name_f]Nora[/name_f] has this really warm, lush sound that I really like and with [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] I think it emphasizes all this friendly, upbeat energy. I think there is a bit of a contrast where [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] feels light and airy and [name_f]Nora[/name_f] as a name is more down to earth.
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Lottie[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- I really love [name_f]Lottie[/name_f] with [name_f]Daisy[/name_f], my only worry is that [name_f]Lottie[/name_f] feels strongly like a nickname to me where [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] feels like a full name in it’s own right. It might be a little restricting if little [name_f]Lottie[/name_f] wants a more formal name to fall back on. However, they’re both charming, feminine, gently old fashioned choices. [name_f]Lottie[/name_f] and [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] feels like the most playful, upbeat pair.
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Lola[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]- I do like [name_f]Lola[/name_f], but I think it’s a more different vibe from [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] compared to the others. [name_f]Lola[/name_f] combines the warmth of [name_f]Nora[/name_f] with the sass of [name_f]Ruby[/name_f], but while [name_f]Nora[/name_f] shares a literary spirit with [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] and [name_f]Ruby[/name_f] echoes Daisy’s friendly sound, [name_f]Lola[/name_f] really doesn’t do either. I tend to lean towards very complimentary sibling names, but [name_f]Lola[/name_f] and [name_f]Daisy[/name_f] have a fun contrast that could appeal as well. And they’re hardly clashing, just slightly more different than I prefer.