Hey there Nameberry! We learned we’re having a girl a few weeks ago and are just getting down and dirty in the naming business. The husband and I agreed on a list of things important to us in a name. [name]Bear[/name] with me - we’re getting a little crazy about it.
- It needs to have history and be an established name. We’re not really into Biblical names, but we love almost anything ancient, especially if it has a story to go along with it.
- Low popularity. This is more his hangup than mine - he has a very common first and hated it so much that he now goes exclusively by his middle.
- We love the more daring, funky side of the classics. I think our goal is to choose a name that is both timeless and fun.
- We’re going to shorten the name to something unless it’s already very short, though we won’t use it exclusively. We’re pretty open-minded about this.
So! Here are some names we’re considering:
[name]Genevieve[/name]: Family name. We would really rather people not call her [name]Gen[/name] (we were thinking more along the lines of [name]Viv[/name], Vee, and [name]Vivi[/name]) and it almost seems too princessy in a bad way. It’s one of our top contenders at the moment, though.
[name]Juliet[/name]: [name]Romeo[/name] and [name]Juliet[/name] is my least favorite play in the history of plays. But I love the sounds, and it honors a relative very close to me.
[name]Prudence[/name]: [name]ADORE[/name] nickname [name]Pru[/name]. Nothing but bad reviews from friends. Not in love with the entire name.
[name]Violet[/name]: It’s getting popular. People really like this name for us, but we’re not really sure if it’s the one.
[name]Margot[/name]: I don’t know if I would want her to be just [name]Margot[/name]. I’m not fond of [name]Margaret[/name].
[name]Vivienne[/name]: So, so beautiful. Possibly a little too star-baby.
[name]Helena[/name]: I think this name is just lovely. I don’t like nicknames [name]Lena[/name] or [name]Lainey[/name] (I prefer the prn. hel-in-a to begin with).
We’d really appreciate suggestions at this point. Thanks!